Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Philosophy, Metaphysics & the Afterlife
new theory...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Harte" data-source="post: 28536" data-attributes="member: 443"><p><strong>Re: new theory...</strong></p><p></p><p><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(\"systemoftheuniverse\")</div></p><p>SOU,</p><p> (From <a href="http://livefromcern.web.cern.ch/livefromcern/antimatter/history/AM-history01-a.html" target="_blank">HERE</a>)</span></p><p> </p><p>[font=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif] [/font]I may be a joke, but you have revealed yourself as ignorant. Antimatter was first discovered (meaning actually found) in 1932. Get your head out of your *** or wherever it's been since you were born and you might find out a few things about the world. For example, did you know that humans have actually visited the Moon?</p><p>For your edification, here are some links about this substance that you had assumed was only theoretical:</p><p> </p><p><a href="http://encarta.msn.com/related_761567432_12/Antimatter_Atoms_Created_for_the_First_Time.html#tcsel" target="_blank">http://encarta.msn.com/related_761567432_1...Time.html#tcsel</a></p><p> </p><p><a href="http://www.psigate.ac.uk/roads/cgi-bin/psisearch.pl?term1=antimatter&limit=0&subject=All" target="_blank">http://www.psigate.ac.uk/roads/cgi-bin/psi...t=0&subject=All</a></p><p> </p><p><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(\"systemoftheuniverse\")</div></p><p> </p><p>Gas is one phase of matter (any matter,) there are four phases of matter. Gasses do not repel in the least. Nor do liquids attract. Liquids (most liquids) exhibit what is called "surface tension", which is a very weak electromagnetic attractive force which is also present in the other forms of matter. With gasses (and plasmas), this weak force is overcome by the energy (temperature) of the molecules in question. In a solid, this force is present but not observed because there are stronger attractive forces at work (molecular bonds).</p><p> </p><p><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(\"systemoftheuniverse\")</div></p><p>Quantum fluctuation is occuring in all places at all times (even in the spaces between your "three elements of matter" in every atom in every object.</p><p>If you are asking what are the chances of a proton, a neutron and an electron combining to make an atom, the answer is 100%, if they are near enough to each other. This is called deuterium, or "heavy hydrogen". On the other hand, if by "subatomic level" you mean a level at less than atomic (which is what it actually means) then the chances are almost zero, unless you have applied a tremendous amount of force (enormous gravity can combine electrons with protons, creating neutrons, that's how a neutron star is formed.)</p><p> </p><p><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(\"systemoftheuniverse\")</div> The nature of this question implies that you know nothing about quantum fluctuation. This phenomenon was predicted by quantum mechanics, it cannot be observed <em>per se</em>. You are asking for an explanation of quantum fluctuation as if it needs one. It does not. It is completely explained by the original quantum theory. In fact, this theory predates the above mentioned discovery of antimatter (and also predicted that.) Run your own Google search this time.</p><p> </p><p><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(\"systemoftheuniverse\")</div></p><p> </p><p>Find the neutron in a hydrogen atom, Mr. Science.</p><p> </p><p>Here you reveal your complete lack of understanding of electromagnetism. Protons and neutrons are in no way associated with "creating" electromagnetic energy or electricity or magnetism or electromagnetism. These statements of yours make no sense whatsoever. They are actually nonsensical.</p><p> </p><p><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(\"systemoftheuniverse\")</div></p><p>Perhaps you should examine the contents of your own pipe before making such a suggestion.</p><p> </p><p>Harte</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Harte, post: 28536, member: 443"] [b]Re: new theory...[/b] <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(\"systemoftheuniverse\")</div> SOU, (From [url=http://livefromcern.web.cern.ch/livefromcern/antimatter/history/AM-history01-a.html]HERE[/url])</span> [font=Arial][/font] [font=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif] [/font]I may be a joke, but you have revealed yourself as ignorant. Antimatter was first discovered (meaning actually found) in 1932. Get your head out of your *** or wherever it's been since you were born and you might find out a few things about the world. For example, did you know that humans have actually visited the Moon? For your edification, here are some links about this substance that you had assumed was only theoretical: [url=http://encarta.msn.com/related_761567432_12/Antimatter_Atoms_Created_for_the_First_Time.html#tcsel]http://encarta.msn.com/related_761567432_1...Time.html#tcsel[/url] [url=http://www.psigate.ac.uk/roads/cgi-bin/psisearch.pl?term1=antimatter&limit=0&subject=All]http://www.psigate.ac.uk/roads/cgi-bin/psi...t=0&subject=All[/url] <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(\"systemoftheuniverse\")</div> Gas is one phase of matter (any matter,) there are four phases of matter. Gasses do not repel in the least. Nor do liquids attract. Liquids (most liquids) exhibit what is called "surface tension", which is a very weak electromagnetic attractive force which is also present in the other forms of matter. With gasses (and plasmas), this weak force is overcome by the energy (temperature) of the molecules in question. In a solid, this force is present but not observed because there are stronger attractive forces at work (molecular bonds). <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(\"systemoftheuniverse\")</div> Quantum fluctuation is occuring in all places at all times (even in the spaces between your "three elements of matter" in every atom in every object. If you are asking what are the chances of a proton, a neutron and an electron combining to make an atom, the answer is 100%, if they are near enough to each other. This is called deuterium, or "heavy hydrogen". On the other hand, if by "subatomic level" you mean a level at less than atomic (which is what it actually means) then the chances are almost zero, unless you have applied a tremendous amount of force (enormous gravity can combine electrons with protons, creating neutrons, that's how a neutron star is formed.) <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(\"systemoftheuniverse\")</div> The nature of this question implies that you know nothing about quantum fluctuation. This phenomenon was predicted by quantum mechanics, it cannot be observed [i]per se[/i]. You are asking for an explanation of quantum fluctuation as if it needs one. It does not. It is completely explained by the original quantum theory. In fact, this theory predates the above mentioned discovery of antimatter (and also predicted that.) Run your own Google search this time. <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(\"systemoftheuniverse\")</div> Find the neutron in a hydrogen atom, Mr. Science. Here you reveal your complete lack of understanding of electromagnetism. Protons and neutrons are in no way associated with "creating" electromagnetic energy or electricity or magnetism or electromagnetism. These statements of yours make no sense whatsoever. They are actually nonsensical. <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(\"systemoftheuniverse\")</div> Perhaps you should examine the contents of your own pipe before making such a suggestion. Harte [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Philosophy, Metaphysics & the Afterlife
new theory...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top