Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Philosophy, Metaphysics & the Afterlife
new theory...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="thenumbersix" data-source="post: 28539" data-attributes="member: 393"><p><strong>Re: new theory...</strong></p><p></p><p><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(\"systemoftheuniverse\")</div></p><p></p><p>The arrival of there supposedly being masses of dark matter around to fuel the expansion is probably the most popular theory to explain the apparent accelerating expansion of the universe. All of these are still in a fairly early stage but do seem to have some substantial observational evidence, let's seee if it pans out..</p><p></p><p> <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(\"systemoftheuniverse\")</div></p><p></p><p>As I understand it antimatter is matter that is the opposite that your are looking for, it is not another 'element' it is an opposite element, there are anti-neutrons, anti-protons and anti-electrons, no doubt these can combine to make anti-atoms if left alone by matter ?</p><p></p><p>Isn't it thought that during the big bang an almost equal amount of matter and anti-matter came into existence but anhialated most of each other to leave behind the 'solid' matter that was around at the very beginning ?</p><p></p><p>The explanation for why there wasn't a mutual destruction I don't really know but no doubt Universe building is not an exact science, if this is a fluid process then sooner or later this eventuality must happen, otherwise we wouldn't be here to observe all of these things....</p><p></p><p>If there was an equal mutual destruction of matter and anti-matter the universe would again not exist, there would be a void of space and time possibly, would quantum fluctuation still work with the absence of anything ? Haven't they said that a point where mutual fluctuation has tipped the balance enough at one point to trigger the big bang ? This would then imply the presence of space and physics as we know it or is quantum physics working differently here also ?</p><p></p><p>Anyway, with a void where matter and anti-matter have perfectly annhialated each other would the big bang process eventually start all over again, this is mostly theoretical and some off the top of my head and obviously un-proven but to me for intelligent life to come about the Universe must be in a natural process of some sorts where natural selection works at its' most basic...somethimes the conditions are right and life evolves other times it is not right enough to sustain suitable physics to hold it all together and it collapses back into some almighty singularity, who knows, I'm just scratching around in it here...</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="thenumbersix, post: 28539, member: 393"] [b]Re: new theory...[/b] <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(\"systemoftheuniverse\")</div> The arrival of there supposedly being masses of dark matter around to fuel the expansion is probably the most popular theory to explain the apparent accelerating expansion of the universe. All of these are still in a fairly early stage but do seem to have some substantial observational evidence, let's seee if it pans out.. <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(\"systemoftheuniverse\")</div> As I understand it antimatter is matter that is the opposite that your are looking for, it is not another 'element' it is an opposite element, there are anti-neutrons, anti-protons and anti-electrons, no doubt these can combine to make anti-atoms if left alone by matter ? Isn't it thought that during the big bang an almost equal amount of matter and anti-matter came into existence but anhialated most of each other to leave behind the 'solid' matter that was around at the very beginning ? The explanation for why there wasn't a mutual destruction I don't really know but no doubt Universe building is not an exact science, if this is a fluid process then sooner or later this eventuality must happen, otherwise we wouldn't be here to observe all of these things.... If there was an equal mutual destruction of matter and anti-matter the universe would again not exist, there would be a void of space and time possibly, would quantum fluctuation still work with the absence of anything ? Haven't they said that a point where mutual fluctuation has tipped the balance enough at one point to trigger the big bang ? This would then imply the presence of space and physics as we know it or is quantum physics working differently here also ? Anyway, with a void where matter and anti-matter have perfectly annhialated each other would the big bang process eventually start all over again, this is mostly theoretical and some off the top of my head and obviously un-proven but to me for intelligent life to come about the Universe must be in a natural process of some sorts where natural selection works at its' most basic...somethimes the conditions are right and life evolves other times it is not right enough to sustain suitable physics to hold it all together and it collapses back into some almighty singularity, who knows, I'm just scratching around in it here... [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Philosophy, Metaphysics & the Afterlife
new theory...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top