Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Time Travel Forum
Time Travelers
On the Political Philosophy of Time Travelers
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="dimension-1hacker" data-source="post: 199343" data-attributes="member: 11791"><p>I do not claim victory when you do not disprove the tautology "every reason needs a reason to be true or there is no reason for it to be true". How can I claim victory when you do nothing to disprove it but call the statement delusional, the person that does not question everything understands nothing.</p><p></p><p>The peom? Do you know what the metaphor can be applied to, asked if you can prove it. Asked if you could prove the peom was written by who think is the author. A poem is a poem if you perceive it to be one, I did not question that as you implied and am not questioning what something is when it is subjective. You said this information is true that a quick google search proved it, why? How do you know the sources are correct? No source is inherently trustworthy which I can prove, to blindly pick and choose if to eat an apple that could be rotten with your eyes closed, and once you taste the apple you don't spit it out as to potentially retain what you perceive to be pride. It is going down a rabbit hole of self delusion never to emerge one can go so deep, I do not call a statement delusional, I ask you to prove the statement, I do not because I admit I do not know but you seem sure, why not show it? Don't laugh in Descarte's face!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="dimension-1hacker, post: 199343, member: 11791"] I do not claim victory when you do not disprove the tautology "every reason needs a reason to be true or there is no reason for it to be true". How can I claim victory when you do nothing to disprove it but call the statement delusional, the person that does not question everything understands nothing. The peom? Do you know what the metaphor can be applied to, asked if you can prove it. Asked if you could prove the peom was written by who think is the author. A poem is a poem if you perceive it to be one, I did not question that as you implied and am not questioning what something is when it is subjective. You said this information is true that a quick google search proved it, why? How do you know the sources are correct? No source is inherently trustworthy which I can prove, to blindly pick and choose if to eat an apple that could be rotten with your eyes closed, and once you taste the apple you don't spit it out as to potentially retain what you perceive to be pride. It is going down a rabbit hole of self delusion never to emerge one can go so deep, I do not call a statement delusional, I ask you to prove the statement, I do not because I admit I do not know but you seem sure, why not show it? Don't laugh in Descarte's face! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Time Travel Forum
Time Travelers
On the Political Philosophy of Time Travelers
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top