Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Time Travel Forum
Time Machines & Experiments
Opening A Real Dimensional Portals With Audio Frequency
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Apri1" data-source="post: 174957" data-attributes="member: 10340"><p>Dude, literally just ask anyone who was on the site. I didn't frequent there, mostly due to the stupidly strict requirements. Had to seed for months, upload new content, etc. to push up your ratio (and hopefully get something before the bots snagged it). All of it had to be done to perfection. No transcodes, perfect rips, logs of everything. But yes, as I said, it's shut down now. No idea where the new site is. But it certainly wasn't the only one.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Youtube doesn't do shit with VHS tapes lmao. Not sure why you keep believing that. Youtube only deals with digital files. Right, lossy compression doesn't mean that the video is a hoax. What makes it a hoax is that you're pretending lossy audio is a pure tone. Do you... even understand the words I'm writing? Feels like people can't read sometimes. A pure tone is ask described. A particular soundwave with a particular frequency. 432hz, for example. Youtube does a lossy compression on the audio, meaning that it's not necessarily 432hz. Which debunks the claim.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>You're thinking of lossless compression. Which is rarely done except by archivists or people hardcore about quality (for example, the What.CD community). Since to the basic layperson, lossy vs lossless sound/look identical. They're just technically different. Transcodes from lossy formats are a bad thing because over time they lose quality and get distorted. A good example with this is of jpg images. I'm sure you're familiar with the "grainy" appearance that can often get very bad if it's constantly recompressed/resaved/reuploaded.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Vinyl today is a modern day scam. Analogue works great and retains 100% accuracy if you record using an analogue method and never transcode to digital. However, modern day vinyls are transcoded to digital, and then transcoded analogue formats which degrade over time. If the song has touched electronics, it's just better to get a lossy digital file as close to the source as possible.</p><p></p><p>As for DVD movies... usually what's done is an incredibly lossy compression to shrink it down to be able to fit on a DVD. This is still very high quality, but naturally would lack pure tones. Not a huge deal because to the layperson it sounds and looks fine. However, the original high quality versions are still stored/saved by the company that made the film. Ideally for later releases with less compression.</p><p></p><p>Ultimately, the issue comes from the fact that they tried to play a pure tone over youtube. Since the claim is that the pure tone is what generated the effect. Very easy to see why it's fake. Regardless, I recreated the experiment using ideal conditions and still got nothing. AKA a confirmed hoax. Not sure why you're still trying to defend an obvious fake?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Apri1, post: 174957, member: 10340"] Dude, literally just ask anyone who was on the site. I didn't frequent there, mostly due to the stupidly strict requirements. Had to seed for months, upload new content, etc. to push up your ratio (and hopefully get something before the bots snagged it). All of it had to be done to perfection. No transcodes, perfect rips, logs of everything. But yes, as I said, it's shut down now. No idea where the new site is. But it certainly wasn't the only one. Youtube doesn't do shit with VHS tapes lmao. Not sure why you keep believing that. Youtube only deals with digital files. Right, lossy compression doesn't mean that the video is a hoax. What makes it a hoax is that you're pretending lossy audio is a pure tone. Do you... even understand the words I'm writing? Feels like people can't read sometimes. A pure tone is ask described. A particular soundwave with a particular frequency. 432hz, for example. Youtube does a lossy compression on the audio, meaning that it's not necessarily 432hz. Which debunks the claim. You're thinking of lossless compression. Which is rarely done except by archivists or people hardcore about quality (for example, the What.CD community). Since to the basic layperson, lossy vs lossless sound/look identical. They're just technically different. Transcodes from lossy formats are a bad thing because over time they lose quality and get distorted. A good example with this is of jpg images. I'm sure you're familiar with the "grainy" appearance that can often get very bad if it's constantly recompressed/resaved/reuploaded. Vinyl today is a modern day scam. Analogue works great and retains 100% accuracy if you record using an analogue method and never transcode to digital. However, modern day vinyls are transcoded to digital, and then transcoded analogue formats which degrade over time. If the song has touched electronics, it's just better to get a lossy digital file as close to the source as possible. As for DVD movies... usually what's done is an incredibly lossy compression to shrink it down to be able to fit on a DVD. This is still very high quality, but naturally would lack pure tones. Not a huge deal because to the layperson it sounds and looks fine. However, the original high quality versions are still stored/saved by the company that made the film. Ideally for later releases with less compression. Ultimately, the issue comes from the fact that they tried to play a pure tone over youtube. Since the claim is that the pure tone is what generated the effect. Very easy to see why it's fake. Regardless, I recreated the experiment using ideal conditions and still got nothing. AKA a confirmed hoax. Not sure why you're still trying to defend an obvious fake? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Time Travel Forum
Time Machines & Experiments
Opening A Real Dimensional Portals With Audio Frequency
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top