Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Spirituality & Mysticism
Opposing beliefs/religions/spirituality.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Harte" data-source="post: 191855" data-attributes="member: 443"><p>You assume I haven't "done some reading."</p><p>You made a ridiculous claim:</p><p></p><p>If "The history of science is full of this..." sort of thing, why haven't you provided any instances where it happened?</p><p>You're the one that said this, not me. Why should I have to "do some reading?" </p><p>You give Piltdown as an example, but that wasn't done as a means to show the superiority of Europeans. It might have been sooner detected as a hoax if not for that belief though (<a href="https://answersingenesis.org/human-evolution/piltdown-man/fraud-and-forgery-in-paleoanthropology/" target="_blank">see "Eolith Theory" for more on this.</a>) Dawson perpetrated many other archaeological hoaxes, none of which had to do with humans. Do you suppose he was also trying to promote the idea that European <em>animals</em> were also superior?</p><p></p><p>What you say concerning the bones of Europeans found in North America is simply hogwash. You evidently keep yourself 40 years behind what's currently known, as you can only be talking about Kennewick Man, whose DNA HAS been analyzed - not even close to European.</p><p></p><p>You purposefully have put yourself in an ongoing fantasy world concerning established facts in Archaeology. I could speculate on why that might be. After all, learning is hard work. So much easier to avoid it by claiming "they" are hiding it all anyway so why bother.</p><p></p><p>Regarding theories, exactly how is it that you think you were able to post what you posted, if "theories are just fancy ways of saying I guess?" I mean, quantum theory - the same theory that accounts for the appearance of particles out of nothing - accounts for the very device you used to post that.</p><p></p><p>"I guess" you don't care to know much at all about the universe you are a part of.</p><p></p><p>Harte</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Harte, post: 191855, member: 443"] You assume I haven't "done some reading." You made a ridiculous claim: If "The history of science is full of this..." sort of thing, why haven't you provided any instances where it happened? You're the one that said this, not me. Why should I have to "do some reading?" You give Piltdown as an example, but that wasn't done as a means to show the superiority of Europeans. It might have been sooner detected as a hoax if not for that belief though ([URL='https://answersingenesis.org/human-evolution/piltdown-man/fraud-and-forgery-in-paleoanthropology/']see "Eolith Theory" for more on this.[/URL]) Dawson perpetrated many other archaeological hoaxes, none of which had to do with humans. Do you suppose he was also trying to promote the idea that European [I]animals[/I] were also superior? What you say concerning the bones of Europeans found in North America is simply hogwash. You evidently keep yourself 40 years behind what's currently known, as you can only be talking about Kennewick Man, whose DNA HAS been analyzed - not even close to European. You purposefully have put yourself in an ongoing fantasy world concerning established facts in Archaeology. I could speculate on why that might be. After all, learning is hard work. So much easier to avoid it by claiming "they" are hiding it all anyway so why bother. Regarding theories, exactly how is it that you think you were able to post what you posted, if "theories are just fancy ways of saying I guess?" I mean, quantum theory - the same theory that accounts for the appearance of particles out of nothing - accounts for the very device you used to post that. "I guess" you don't care to know much at all about the universe you are a part of. Harte [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Spirituality & Mysticism
Opposing beliefs/religions/spirituality.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top