Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Conspiracies & Cover-ups
Our new esteemed Head of Homeland Security
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Judge Bean" data-source="post: 14909" data-attributes="member: 42"><p><strong>Our new esteemed Head of Homeland Security</strong></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>In light of this, it is interesting to note that Rumsfeld was the chief emissary to Iraq during the long war with Iran-- i.e., the one making sure that Saddam was pumped up on American arms while he was gassing his own people. The full details of these transactions will never be made public.</p><p></p><p>Also, during the "Gulf War" (I love to put these pert phrases in quotes, since they strike me as being so far from the truth, but are instead only packing labels) the Saudi security was a primary concern, and a deal was made to install our military there permanently. To lodge Judeo-Christian troops in the Holy Land has never been a votegetter in Arabia, not to mention allying the tribes with the Infidel against a brother nation. </p><p></p><p>Also, 911 looks more and more like a Saudi operation the closer you look at it: the money, the nationality of the hijackers, the slick execution... without much <em>religious </em>hoopla, either, which was, after all, the ostensible purpose of the attack-- to stage a spectacular martyrdom. I doubt we can tell how far apart politics and religion really is in the modern world, but there is a joint effort by all sides to stage the current global conflict as a religious war. The trouble is that under the surface it's still primarily about the economy.</p><p></p><p>"It's about the economy, stupid," is the slogan that Clinton supposedly had framed on his wall while he ran for president. The question is, then, who is supposed to be stupid, Bush while banging the wardrums, or all of us English speakers (with the notable classy exception of Canada and a few others) for marching to them?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Judge Bean, post: 14909, member: 42"] [b]Our new esteemed Head of Homeland Security[/b] In light of this, it is interesting to note that Rumsfeld was the chief emissary to Iraq during the long war with Iran-- i.e., the one making sure that Saddam was pumped up on American arms while he was gassing his own people. The full details of these transactions will never be made public. Also, during the "Gulf War" (I love to put these pert phrases in quotes, since they strike me as being so far from the truth, but are instead only packing labels) the Saudi security was a primary concern, and a deal was made to install our military there permanently. To lodge Judeo-Christian troops in the Holy Land has never been a votegetter in Arabia, not to mention allying the tribes with the Infidel against a brother nation. Also, 911 looks more and more like a Saudi operation the closer you look at it: the money, the nationality of the hijackers, the slick execution... without much [i]religious [/i]hoopla, either, which was, after all, the ostensible purpose of the attack-- to stage a spectacular martyrdom. I doubt we can tell how far apart politics and religion really is in the modern world, but there is a joint effort by all sides to stage the current global conflict as a religious war. The trouble is that under the surface it's still primarily about the economy. "It's about the economy, stupid," is the slogan that Clinton supposedly had framed on his wall while he ran for president. The question is, then, who is supposed to be stupid, Bush while banging the wardrums, or all of us English speakers (with the notable classy exception of Canada and a few others) for marching to them? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Conspiracies & Cover-ups
Our new esteemed Head of Homeland Security
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top