Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Conspiracies & Cover-ups
Our new esteemed Head of Homeland Security
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="dancho" data-source="post: 14910" data-attributes="member: 245"><p><strong>Our new esteemed Head of Homeland Security</strong></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Thanks for your thoughtful reply. I believe that Israel is very happy to see conflict between Islamic fundalmentalists and the USA-- and for the reasons that you outlined. But, I'm still convinced that the attacks were planned and executed by Saudi agents. </p><p> </p><p>You asked why the Saudis would do such a thing, if it meant bringing American troops to the Gulf Region. The answer to this is that the US troops have been in Saudi Arabia since 1991-- after the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait. The Saudis attacked the US on 9/11 as part of scheme to blackmail Bush Jr. and get the US troops OUT of Saudi Arabia.</p><p></p><p>I'm saying that old-time CIA stooge Saddam Hussein and old-time CIA chief G. Bush Sr. cooked up a plot to get US troops into the middle east using a brilliant plan of deception. Saddam sent his troops to Kuwait to loot and pillage (and get killed) while he cooled his heels in Baghdad. The key thing here is that Saddam did not give a damn about his people-- once you accept that, the rest of the plan makes a twisted kind of sense. We don't know (and probably will never know) what Saddam was paid to do the deed, but I'm convinced he would sell out for less than you might think. </p><p> </p><p>Think about the fact that it took six months for the Allied (US) forces to deploy to Saudi Arabia. Six months! In that much time, Saddam could have launched dozens of terror attacks at the US. But he did not. He could have held US and Allied civilians (mostly oil company employees) hostage in Iraq-- but he did not. In fact, he forced them to leave the country. Finally, consider the final outcome of the battle. A few dozen Allied casualties (mostly due to friendly fire). Saddam is the "hero" of the Arab world. A half million US and allied troops in Saudi Arabia and Kuwait. And, ultimately, if Kuwait or Saudi Arabia fail to follow orders from Washington, we would withdraw out troops. Saddam's military may have been "weak"-- but it was strong enough to conquer Saudi Arabia and Kuwait. And hang the Saudi King from a lamp-post in the name of the Bath Revolution. And at no time would any of the "suckers" (that's us) suspect that this was all part of a plan to control middle eastern oil from Washington. Of course, once Saddam invaded Saudi Arabia, we could come "riding to the rescue" again and "save the day." Yeah. Right. </p><p> </p><p>So, the critical thing is that the Saudis attacked America in order to get the troops OUT of Saudi Arabia. And to get rid of Saddam. And to get rid of Osama Bin Laden and his anti-Saudi Al Queda organization. In 2001 the Saudis launched a counter-offensive in a weird war that has been going on since 1991. And they are winning (so far). </p><p> </p><p>So where is Saddam? Did he leave Iraq and go to Syria as The Mossad assumed he would? Of course not. He surrendered to the US, his true "allies" despite the fact that we turned on him, because he desperately wants to "make another deal." After all, wouldn't you do the same thing? His "testimony" is golden to the Bush admininistration. Just wait and see what he ends up doing. I'm looking forward to it. </p><p> </p><p>I'm convinced that the Neocon strategy for world domination was hatched after the Falklands War. That war demonstrated the proper technique for waging a war-- quick and clean. The Grenada invasion proved that US imperialism would fly. Then came the big test-- Panama. We invaded and occupied a "friendly" country and used a CIA stooge (Noriega) to pull it off. Where is Noriega now? Is he really at his private "prison" apartment where he still wears his old uniforms and where other prisoners rarely see him? Is he? </p><p> </p><p>Then came the ultimate prize. Saudi Arabia using a, well, DASTARDLY, plan that involved another CIA stooge, Saddam Hussein. And the plan worked like a charm, except that the Saudis were clever enough to know that if they could <em>pay for Bush Jr.'s election</em>, they could launch their counter-offensive and regain their sovereignty. After all, they couldn't blackmail anyone else in quite the same way. </p><p> </p><p>Hey, you'll know I'm on the right track if I suddenly disappear! <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite38" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="dancho, post: 14910, member: 245"] [b]Our new esteemed Head of Homeland Security[/b] Thanks for your thoughtful reply. I believe that Israel is very happy to see conflict between Islamic fundalmentalists and the USA-- and for the reasons that you outlined. But, I'm still convinced that the attacks were planned and executed by Saudi agents. You asked why the Saudis would do such a thing, if it meant bringing American troops to the Gulf Region. The answer to this is that the US troops have been in Saudi Arabia since 1991-- after the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait. The Saudis attacked the US on 9/11 as part of scheme to blackmail Bush Jr. and get the US troops OUT of Saudi Arabia. I'm saying that old-time CIA stooge Saddam Hussein and old-time CIA chief G. Bush Sr. cooked up a plot to get US troops into the middle east using a brilliant plan of deception. Saddam sent his troops to Kuwait to loot and pillage (and get killed) while he cooled his heels in Baghdad. The key thing here is that Saddam did not give a damn about his people-- once you accept that, the rest of the plan makes a twisted kind of sense. We don't know (and probably will never know) what Saddam was paid to do the deed, but I'm convinced he would sell out for less than you might think. Think about the fact that it took six months for the Allied (US) forces to deploy to Saudi Arabia. Six months! In that much time, Saddam could have launched dozens of terror attacks at the US. But he did not. He could have held US and Allied civilians (mostly oil company employees) hostage in Iraq-- but he did not. In fact, he forced them to leave the country. Finally, consider the final outcome of the battle. A few dozen Allied casualties (mostly due to friendly fire). Saddam is the "hero" of the Arab world. A half million US and allied troops in Saudi Arabia and Kuwait. And, ultimately, if Kuwait or Saudi Arabia fail to follow orders from Washington, we would withdraw out troops. Saddam's military may have been "weak"-- but it was strong enough to conquer Saudi Arabia and Kuwait. And hang the Saudi King from a lamp-post in the name of the Bath Revolution. And at no time would any of the "suckers" (that's us) suspect that this was all part of a plan to control middle eastern oil from Washington. Of course, once Saddam invaded Saudi Arabia, we could come "riding to the rescue" again and "save the day." Yeah. Right. So, the critical thing is that the Saudis attacked America in order to get the troops OUT of Saudi Arabia. And to get rid of Saddam. And to get rid of Osama Bin Laden and his anti-Saudi Al Queda organization. In 2001 the Saudis launched a counter-offensive in a weird war that has been going on since 1991. And they are winning (so far). So where is Saddam? Did he leave Iraq and go to Syria as The Mossad assumed he would? Of course not. He surrendered to the US, his true "allies" despite the fact that we turned on him, because he desperately wants to "make another deal." After all, wouldn't you do the same thing? His "testimony" is golden to the Bush admininistration. Just wait and see what he ends up doing. I'm looking forward to it. I'm convinced that the Neocon strategy for world domination was hatched after the Falklands War. That war demonstrated the proper technique for waging a war-- quick and clean. The Grenada invasion proved that US imperialism would fly. Then came the big test-- Panama. We invaded and occupied a "friendly" country and used a CIA stooge (Noriega) to pull it off. Where is Noriega now? Is he really at his private "prison" apartment where he still wears his old uniforms and where other prisoners rarely see him? Is he? Then came the ultimate prize. Saudi Arabia using a, well, DASTARDLY, plan that involved another CIA stooge, Saddam Hussein. And the plan worked like a charm, except that the Saudis were clever enough to know that if they could [i]pay for Bush Jr.'s election[/i], they could launch their counter-offensive and regain their sovereignty. After all, they couldn't blackmail anyone else in quite the same way. Hey, you'll know I'm on the right track if I suddenly disappear! :) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Conspiracies & Cover-ups
Our new esteemed Head of Homeland Security
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top