Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
General Discussion Forum
General Discussion
Paycheck Discussion
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="karizma" data-source="post: 8786" data-attributes="member: 47"><p><strong>Paycheck Discussion</strong></p><p></p><p>From my understanding the machine worked with "optics". I know. What kind of optics, how do the optics work, etc., etc. It seemed to me that they didn't explain the concept of the machine enough. Everybody that put their hand on the machine saw different parts of the future. It also seems like they might have asked the machine a question. I'm a little fuzzy on that detail. Ok, so we have the sense of touch and sound, but still no optics. Affleck was able to view his immediate future and the world's far off future. I agree that the story line was a little lacking when it came down to the most needed details. They gave more history on the stupid birds from the apartment than they did on the "time machine". Which only shows time in general and doesn't actually go anywhere.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="karizma, post: 8786, member: 47"] [b]Paycheck Discussion[/b] From my understanding the machine worked with "optics". I know. What kind of optics, how do the optics work, etc., etc. It seemed to me that they didn't explain the concept of the machine enough. Everybody that put their hand on the machine saw different parts of the future. It also seems like they might have asked the machine a question. I'm a little fuzzy on that detail. Ok, so we have the sense of touch and sound, but still no optics. Affleck was able to view his immediate future and the world's far off future. I agree that the story line was a little lacking when it came down to the most needed details. They gave more history on the stupid birds from the apartment than they did on the "time machine". Which only shows time in general and doesn't actually go anywhere. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
General Discussion Forum
General Discussion
Paycheck Discussion
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top