Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Conspiracies & Cover-ups
Pentagon: Rumsfeld misspoke on Flight 93 crash
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Judge Bean" data-source="post: 16748" data-attributes="member: 42"><p><strong>Pentagon: Rumsfeld misspoke on Flight 93 crash</strong></p><p></p><p>But, is he saying that the plane was shot down by the <em>attackers</em>? His speech is so garbled regularly, and wild with rotating clauses, that it's almost impossible to interpret any fragment of a sentence like that. </p><p></p><p>However, the way he usually talks is by "linkage," in which the preceding clause subconsciously reminds him of an unrelated thing that he may not really want to speak, but cannot help it due to the semiautomatic engine of speech. To the average person, it sounds like what is usually called "rambling," but it differs from random stuff in that the speaker "prompts" himself.</p><p></p><p>Notice his constant use of rhetorical questions, which he asks <em>himself</em>: he needs the prompting to get through the statement because the statement is inherently a lie and full of dissembling, and he knows it and can scarcely control it. </p><p></p><p>So, what makes you feel better, that he is lying in whatever he says, or that he might have accidentally told the truth?</p><p></p><p>You know, folks, if people in positions of power in our government got in front of a microphone under the influence of truth serum and blurted out concealed facts in random order, our entire country would collapse in upon itself like a flaming zeppelin.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Judge Bean, post: 16748, member: 42"] [b]Pentagon: Rumsfeld misspoke on Flight 93 crash[/b] But, is he saying that the plane was shot down by the [i]attackers[/i]? His speech is so garbled regularly, and wild with rotating clauses, that it's almost impossible to interpret any fragment of a sentence like that. However, the way he usually talks is by "linkage," in which the preceding clause subconsciously reminds him of an unrelated thing that he may not really want to speak, but cannot help it due to the semiautomatic engine of speech. To the average person, it sounds like what is usually called "rambling," but it differs from random stuff in that the speaker "prompts" himself. Notice his constant use of rhetorical questions, which he asks [i]himself[/i]: he needs the prompting to get through the statement because the statement is inherently a lie and full of dissembling, and he knows it and can scarcely control it. So, what makes you feel better, that he is lying in whatever he says, or that he might have accidentally told the truth? You know, folks, if people in positions of power in our government got in front of a microphone under the influence of truth serum and blurted out concealed facts in random order, our entire country would collapse in upon itself like a flaming zeppelin. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Conspiracies & Cover-ups
Pentagon: Rumsfeld misspoke on Flight 93 crash
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top