Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Conspiracies & Cover-ups
Pentagon Strike: 100% Positive
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="XDrFirefly" data-source="post: 19060" data-attributes="member: 277"><p><strong>Re: 100% Positive</strong></p><p></p><p><strong>Lets begin with the terrorist. Or should I say Arab Names...</strong></p><p><strong></strong></p><p><strong><a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/1559151.stm" target="_blank">"Hijack 'suspects' alive and well" BBC 9.23.01</a></strong></p><p><strong></strong></p><p><strong><a href="http://www.welfarestate.com/911/" target="_blank">Terrorist???</a></strong></p><p><strong></strong></p><p><strong>Next to the Cell Phones</strong></p><p><strong></strong></p><p>Reports of cellphone calls from the allegedly hijacked airplanes on 9/11 were crucial in 'selling' the official version of events. These calls dramatized the horror of 9/11 for the worldwide audience and appeared to prove conclusively that the four 'planes were, in fact, hijacked by terrorists.</p><p></p><p> However, such phone calls are most implausible on technical and scientific grounds - suggesting the cell phone calls were faked.</p><p></p><p> <a href="http://physics911.ca/modules/news/article.php?storyid=6" target="_blank">http://physics911.ca/modules/news/article....e.php?storyid=6</a></p><p></p><p><strong>Ok, to be fair on the Cell phone issue, since it's not aloud to use Cell phone on planes there is very little pre911 data on cell phone useage. I just know how when i'm driving how often I can drop call in some areas, on a big flight the same thing could happen.</strong></p><p><strong><img src="http://www.amics21.com/911/imags/boeing767.jpg" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /></strong>[font=Arial,Verdana,Geneva] The 767 is a trusty workhorse used by airlines the world over. It comes in three types, the 200, 300 and 400 series with increasing fuselage length and increasing capacity.</p><p> </p><p>The one shown here is the very same N612UA that took off from Logan airport that fateful 11 September. Note its stubby nose, characteristic of the 200 series. The inset shows the plane that crashed into the South Tower later that day. Somehow, to me, the fuselage seems just that little bit longer.</p><p> <span style="font-size: 10px"> Perspective is a tricky thing, so let\'s have a look at the scale plans for the 767 below[/font].</span></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 10px"><a href="http://www.boeing.com/commercial/aeromagazine/aero_05/textonly/ps02txt.html" target="_blank"></a></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 10px"><a href="http://www.boeing.com/commercial/aeromagazine/aero_05/textonly/ps02txt.html" target="_blank">Tech Stuff on Planes</a></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 10px"></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 10px">When I find the remote controlled stuff I will post if for now I\'ll have to settle with this. <a href=\'http://www.usatoday.com/graphics/news/gra/uavdrones/frame.htm\' target=\'_blank\'>\"Unmanned Spy Planes\" </a></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 10px"></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 10px">I will have much more to come....</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 10px"></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 10px">Dr FF</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 10px"></span></span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="XDrFirefly, post: 19060, member: 277"] [b]Re: 100% Positive[/b] [b]Lets begin with the terrorist. Or should I say Arab Names... [url='http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/1559151.stm']"Hijack 'suspects' alive and well" BBC 9.23.01[/url] [url=http://www.welfarestate.com/911/]Terrorist???[/url] Next to the Cell Phones [/b] Reports of cellphone calls from the allegedly hijacked airplanes on 9/11 were crucial in 'selling' the official version of events. These calls dramatized the horror of 9/11 for the worldwide audience and appeared to prove conclusively that the four 'planes were, in fact, hijacked by terrorists. However, such phone calls are most implausible on technical and scientific grounds - suggesting the cell phone calls were faked. [url=http://physics911.ca/modules/news/article.php?storyid=6]http://physics911.ca/modules/news/article....e.php?storyid=6[/url] [b]Ok, to be fair on the Cell phone issue, since it's not aloud to use Cell phone on planes there is very little pre911 data on cell phone useage. I just know how when i'm driving how often I can drop call in some areas, on a big flight the same thing could happen. [img]http://www.amics21.com/911/imags/boeing767.jpg[/img][/b][font=Arial,Verdana,Geneva] The 767 is a trusty workhorse used by airlines the world over. It comes in three types, the 200, 300 and 400 series with increasing fuselage length and increasing capacity. The one shown here is the very same N612UA that took off from Logan airport that fateful 11 September. Note its stubby nose, characteristic of the 200 series. The inset shows the plane that crashed into the South Tower later that day. Somehow, to me, the fuselage seems just that little bit longer. [SIZE=2] Perspective is a tricky thing, so let\'s have a look at the scale plans for the 767 below[/font].</span> [url=http://www.boeing.com/commercial/aeromagazine/aero_05/textonly/ps02txt.html] Tech Stuff on Planes[/url] When I find the remote controlled stuff I will post if for now I\'ll have to settle with this. <a href=\'http://www.usatoday.com/graphics/news/gra/uavdrones/frame.htm\' target=\'_blank\'>\"Unmanned Spy Planes\" </a> I will have much more to come.... Dr FF </span>[/SIZE] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Conspiracies & Cover-ups
Pentagon Strike: 100% Positive
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top