Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Aliens & UFOs
Phil Schneider - Alien Agenda
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="JackStagger" data-source="post: 183372" data-attributes="member: 11397"><p>I'm not trying to disagree with anyone, but I personally don't find anything he says credible. He had declined testing of his evidence and offers nothing else in contrast other than hearsay. I see a dying man with serious mental problems, and though that doesn't mean he is a liar I do not find any of his claims compelling. I believe he superficially sought to inspire individuality and awareness, but used a tall tale as an analogue to a fear influence he wanted to leave on the world. I believe he killed himself because of the suffering of his own existence, primarily an overt tendency for self-inflicting wounds combined with naturally failing health and a gasping desire to have an impact. I do not think he was a kind person in the slightest, though I do not see an overtly malicious motive for his deception.</p><p></p><p>A big part of this is how he relays his story, it's never procedural and vivid, it's always very elemental and a bit sophomore in continuity. His routine digressions into the need for American individual liberty, while I certainly appreciate the spirit, digress wildly from his overarching aim of relaying his story. Inconsistencies about his death relayed by his wife imply that he did, in fact, kill himself and that more than a few people were obviously lying to encourage the notion that he was <em>certainly</em> killed— either for a life insurance payout or simply to perpetuate the relevance of his legacy. Some of his claims, such as the use of underground maglev trains being a technology far removed from any civilian sector are plainly false, the first maglev train was finished in 1902 by Germany. Also, he seems to be unaware of the difference in hardness between Ruby and Diamond, which while only one point away on the Mohs hardness scale is magnificently harder than Ruby. I think an engineer should know these things or at least have a notion of them.</p><p></p><p>I find his account interesting but ultimately not a shred of it is corroborated. This is simply because there is no evidence other than a wildly meandering verbal account and material proof he claimed to be genuine but would forever deny laboratory testing. The fact that there was evidence but he would not submit it for any testing is the biggest red flag in my mind. As far as counter heresay, his hand was reportedly mangled from a job accident as a lineman, and he had previously spent time in the hospital for getting "shot" before scampering off for a few more years when the doctor told his friend who admitted him that his wound was very likely self-inflicted. Whether such is true doesn't especially matter in my conclusion, but it does fall in line with it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="JackStagger, post: 183372, member: 11397"] I'm not trying to disagree with anyone, but I personally don't find anything he says credible. He had declined testing of his evidence and offers nothing else in contrast other than hearsay. I see a dying man with serious mental problems, and though that doesn't mean he is a liar I do not find any of his claims compelling. I believe he superficially sought to inspire individuality and awareness, but used a tall tale as an analogue to a fear influence he wanted to leave on the world. I believe he killed himself because of the suffering of his own existence, primarily an overt tendency for self-inflicting wounds combined with naturally failing health and a gasping desire to have an impact. I do not think he was a kind person in the slightest, though I do not see an overtly malicious motive for his deception. A big part of this is how he relays his story, it's never procedural and vivid, it's always very elemental and a bit sophomore in continuity. His routine digressions into the need for American individual liberty, while I certainly appreciate the spirit, digress wildly from his overarching aim of relaying his story. Inconsistencies about his death relayed by his wife imply that he did, in fact, kill himself and that more than a few people were obviously lying to encourage the notion that he was [I]certainly[/I] killed— either for a life insurance payout or simply to perpetuate the relevance of his legacy. Some of his claims, such as the use of underground maglev trains being a technology far removed from any civilian sector are plainly false, the first maglev train was finished in 1902 by Germany. Also, he seems to be unaware of the difference in hardness between Ruby and Diamond, which while only one point away on the Mohs hardness scale is magnificently harder than Ruby. I think an engineer should know these things or at least have a notion of them. I find his account interesting but ultimately not a shred of it is corroborated. This is simply because there is no evidence other than a wildly meandering verbal account and material proof he claimed to be genuine but would forever deny laboratory testing. The fact that there was evidence but he would not submit it for any testing is the biggest red flag in my mind. As far as counter heresay, his hand was reportedly mangled from a job accident as a lineman, and he had previously spent time in the hospital for getting "shot" before scampering off for a few more years when the doctor told his friend who admitted him that his wound was very likely self-inflicted. Whether such is true doesn't especially matter in my conclusion, but it does fall in line with it. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Aliens & UFOs
Phil Schneider - Alien Agenda
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top