Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Time Travel Forum
Time Machines & Experiments
Philadelphia Experiment, what really happened?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Einstein" data-source="post: 78869" data-attributes="member: 288"><p>Hi Phil</p><p></p><p>Just so you know, Popular Mechanics published an article about a man that had invented an invisiblity machine in 1930. There were pictures of the man gradually phasing out. I managed to purchase that issue. So it was public knowledge that invisibility was possible back then. The Philadelphia experiment didn't take place till 13 years later. Probably a much up-scaled version of the guys invention. I can find no info on the guys invention other than that article in Popular Mechanics. Kind of like the history of it's existence has been erased. </p><p></p><p>Of course I've been on a crusade the past couple of years to find out why our science can't figure this stuff out. And what I find out isn't pretty. Newton's laws of motion appear to have been rewritten. Those laws of motion do not apply to anything in our universe. They are false. Of course you wouldn't know that unless you paid attention to the actual physical observations those laws are supposed to be dervied from. So I don't think Newton had anything to do with what we are taught in school. He was a very smart person. So it appears someone is rewriting the history books. In fact for all we know, Newton may not have ever existed at all.</p><p></p><p>Even calculus has been rewritten. It's as if someone doesn't want one generation of mathematicians to communicate with a previous generation.</p><p></p><p>Now Al Bielek seems to tell his own version of the story. And he even has much more detail than others telling the story. I look with suspicion at his version. It's more like disinformation. But the word of mouth stories still persist from people that witnessed the experiment firsthand.</p><p></p><p>The guy that is missing from the history books that you should pay attention to is Tesla. His knowledge about resonant phenomena is probably what the Philadelphia experiment was based upon. You are probably familiar that it is the electric field of a specific wavelength that oscillates through an antenna of a specific length, that generates radio waves. So that basically is two different things in resonance with each other. What about sound waves? Ever seen that Memorex commercial where they shatter a crystal glass with sound of a specific pitch? And then this thing that I'm playing with at present. It's a mechanical oscillator. Tesla is claimed to have invented it. But all the info about it is not quite as it seems. I'm still playing with it. Yesterday I tuned it to a specific vibration, that caused the table I had it on, to shake wildly as if its legs had turned to jelly. It makes me wonder if this was the machine that Tesla destroyed, that got the name, Tesla's earthquake machine. </p><p></p><p>So I am of the opinion that the Philadelphia experiment was about resonance between different types of resonant phenomena. </p><p></p><p>That would invalidate any of the facts and figures about what frequencies to use. If you change the size of the device, everything else has to change with it. And of course the information and math on how to do that appears to be missing. But trial and error will find it out. </p><p></p><p></p><p><em> </em></p><p><em></em></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Einstein, post: 78869, member: 288"] Hi Phil Just so you know, Popular Mechanics published an article about a man that had invented an invisiblity machine in 1930. There were pictures of the man gradually phasing out. I managed to purchase that issue. So it was public knowledge that invisibility was possible back then. The Philadelphia experiment didn't take place till 13 years later. Probably a much up-scaled version of the guys invention. I can find no info on the guys invention other than that article in Popular Mechanics. Kind of like the history of it's existence has been erased. Of course I've been on a crusade the past couple of years to find out why our science can't figure this stuff out. And what I find out isn't pretty. Newton's laws of motion appear to have been rewritten. Those laws of motion do not apply to anything in our universe. They are false. Of course you wouldn't know that unless you paid attention to the actual physical observations those laws are supposed to be dervied from. So I don't think Newton had anything to do with what we are taught in school. He was a very smart person. So it appears someone is rewriting the history books. In fact for all we know, Newton may not have ever existed at all. Even calculus has been rewritten. It's as if someone doesn't want one generation of mathematicians to communicate with a previous generation. Now Al Bielek seems to tell his own version of the story. And he even has much more detail than others telling the story. I look with suspicion at his version. It's more like disinformation. But the word of mouth stories still persist from people that witnessed the experiment firsthand. The guy that is missing from the history books that you should pay attention to is Tesla. His knowledge about resonant phenomena is probably what the Philadelphia experiment was based upon. You are probably familiar that it is the electric field of a specific wavelength that oscillates through an antenna of a specific length, that generates radio waves. So that basically is two different things in resonance with each other. What about sound waves? Ever seen that Memorex commercial where they shatter a crystal glass with sound of a specific pitch? And then this thing that I'm playing with at present. It's a mechanical oscillator. Tesla is claimed to have invented it. But all the info about it is not quite as it seems. I'm still playing with it. Yesterday I tuned it to a specific vibration, that caused the table I had it on, to shake wildly as if its legs had turned to jelly. It makes me wonder if this was the machine that Tesla destroyed, that got the name, Tesla's earthquake machine. So I am of the opinion that the Philadelphia experiment was about resonance between different types of resonant phenomena. That would invalidate any of the facts and figures about what frequencies to use. If you change the size of the device, everything else has to change with it. And of course the information and math on how to do that appears to be missing. But trial and error will find it out. [I] [/I] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Time Travel Forum
Time Machines & Experiments
Philadelphia Experiment, what really happened?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top