Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Time Travel Forum
Time Machines & Experiments
Philadelphia Experiment, what really happened?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Einstein" data-source="post: 78943" data-attributes="member: 288"><p>I was wrong on the date of that magazine. It was Popular Mechanics May 1934, page 645. I got mine off Ebay a few years ago. I did post a picture of that page a while back. But since then, the site where I had the picture has gone belly up. So I haven't found a suitable replacement site yet. If you PM me your email address, I could send that picture to you.</p><p></p><p>Now I've been trying to develop a time machine myself. It's based on the idea of modulating a gravity field with ramp waves in either a decreasing or increasing repetitive pattern. Since the flow rate of time is associated with gravitational field intensity. Changing the intensity will produce a time force in either the positive or negative direction. But I'm running into a big problem. I've been unsuccessful in developing electronic circuits that operate in the zero to 30Hz frequency range. I haven't investigated to see if that could be done using tubes. Using transistors is not working. MosFet transistors are not linear in response which makes them undesirable. I'm almost tempted to develop to use magnets and coils rotating on speed controlled shafts in the specified range. </p><p></p><p>But now after building Tesla's zero time generator, I realize this device appears to mimic the behavior of nuclear force. My experiments with a Tesla coil also show behavior that mimics nuclear force too. So it occurred to me that these devices might actually be amplifying the strong and weak nuclear forces. That kind of ties this to Bob Lazar's claims that there are two types of gravity.</p><p></p><p>Did Tesla or someone find a way to put these two machines in resonance with each other? This is something I want to investigate. </p><p></p><p>As for the laws of physics? There appears to be a disinformation campaign in progress that is severely damaging the knowledge base we are all taught from.</p><p></p><p>Are you familiar with Faraday's left hand rule? Your thumb points the direction of current in a wire, while your fingers point in the direction of the magnetic field. But that rule is being replaced with the right hand rule. Why? All it's going to do is create chaos. </p><p></p><p>I purchased a translated copy of Newton's Principia. It appears to be butchered. Missing segments and pictures. Kind of like it's been edited to remove anything that conflicts with present day physics. But the editors didn't get everything. The mistake was that Newton clearly states that centrifugal force is an acceleration. Mathematically that would be represented as F=A. Yet we are taught in school that F=MA. Let me just say that the equation F=MA is the foundation our physics stands upon. Without that, the whole house of cards falls down. Our reality isn't put together with theories. There are readily observable facts right in front of your nose.</p><p></p><p>If you pay attention when you get in your car, putting your foot on the gas pedal, you feel the presence of weight pushing you into the seat, while the car accelerates. And if you continue to accelerate across the curvature of the earths surface, centrifugal force will develop, making you and the car lighter. That's three forces. Undeniable physical observations, which make them facts. Where is the math to represent those facts?</p><p></p><p>Did you take calculus in school? Are you a little rusty? Try taking a refresher course. I did. Apparently calculus is now being taught backwards. Even the meaning of some basic symbols has been changed. What used to be called an integration is now called a differentiation. What a handicap that would be if you tried to decipher some math from say 50 years ago. But I investigated further. Even the calculus I was taught, was not what Newton invented. Throughout my life, algebra and geometry has helped me solve many problems along the way. I just find it a bit odd, that I have found no applications for the calculus that I was taught. It makes me question that the calculus I was taught may not even be viable mathematics. What a waste of time.</p><p></p><p>So why would the educators try and make us all dumb? Who decides what we all are taught? If you start to think about this, you begin to realize that mankind has nothing to gain, from this kind of control. So it stands to reason that this is not a man made type of control. Who ever the puppet masters are, it appears we are being steered way from this type of knowledge. It's like the Tower of Babel all over again.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Einstein, post: 78943, member: 288"] I was wrong on the date of that magazine. It was Popular Mechanics May 1934, page 645. I got mine off Ebay a few years ago. I did post a picture of that page a while back. But since then, the site where I had the picture has gone belly up. So I haven't found a suitable replacement site yet. If you PM me your email address, I could send that picture to you. Now I've been trying to develop a time machine myself. It's based on the idea of modulating a gravity field with ramp waves in either a decreasing or increasing repetitive pattern. Since the flow rate of time is associated with gravitational field intensity. Changing the intensity will produce a time force in either the positive or negative direction. But I'm running into a big problem. I've been unsuccessful in developing electronic circuits that operate in the zero to 30Hz frequency range. I haven't investigated to see if that could be done using tubes. Using transistors is not working. MosFet transistors are not linear in response which makes them undesirable. I'm almost tempted to develop to use magnets and coils rotating on speed controlled shafts in the specified range. But now after building Tesla's zero time generator, I realize this device appears to mimic the behavior of nuclear force. My experiments with a Tesla coil also show behavior that mimics nuclear force too. So it occurred to me that these devices might actually be amplifying the strong and weak nuclear forces. That kind of ties this to Bob Lazar's claims that there are two types of gravity. Did Tesla or someone find a way to put these two machines in resonance with each other? This is something I want to investigate. As for the laws of physics? There appears to be a disinformation campaign in progress that is severely damaging the knowledge base we are all taught from. Are you familiar with Faraday's left hand rule? Your thumb points the direction of current in a wire, while your fingers point in the direction of the magnetic field. But that rule is being replaced with the right hand rule. Why? All it's going to do is create chaos. I purchased a translated copy of Newton's Principia. It appears to be butchered. Missing segments and pictures. Kind of like it's been edited to remove anything that conflicts with present day physics. But the editors didn't get everything. The mistake was that Newton clearly states that centrifugal force is an acceleration. Mathematically that would be represented as F=A. Yet we are taught in school that F=MA. Let me just say that the equation F=MA is the foundation our physics stands upon. Without that, the whole house of cards falls down. Our reality isn't put together with theories. There are readily observable facts right in front of your nose. If you pay attention when you get in your car, putting your foot on the gas pedal, you feel the presence of weight pushing you into the seat, while the car accelerates. And if you continue to accelerate across the curvature of the earths surface, centrifugal force will develop, making you and the car lighter. That's three forces. Undeniable physical observations, which make them facts. Where is the math to represent those facts? Did you take calculus in school? Are you a little rusty? Try taking a refresher course. I did. Apparently calculus is now being taught backwards. Even the meaning of some basic symbols has been changed. What used to be called an integration is now called a differentiation. What a handicap that would be if you tried to decipher some math from say 50 years ago. But I investigated further. Even the calculus I was taught, was not what Newton invented. Throughout my life, algebra and geometry has helped me solve many problems along the way. I just find it a bit odd, that I have found no applications for the calculus that I was taught. It makes me question that the calculus I was taught may not even be viable mathematics. What a waste of time. So why would the educators try and make us all dumb? Who decides what we all are taught? If you start to think about this, you begin to realize that mankind has nothing to gain, from this kind of control. So it stands to reason that this is not a man made type of control. Who ever the puppet masters are, it appears we are being steered way from this type of knowledge. It's like the Tower of Babel all over again. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Time Travel Forum
Time Machines & Experiments
Philadelphia Experiment, what really happened?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top