Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Conspiracies & Cover-ups
Project Pelican
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Cirrus" data-source="post: 175370" data-attributes="member: 10493"><p>If this is all true, it's bad and, depending on the terms of the lease, are cause for automatic termination of the agreement. </p><p></p><p>I'm a bit skeptical only because this port is owned by a state agency. Most ports are owned and/or operated by the states with limited federal oversight unless something like the allegations made here arise. In agreeing to common lease terms, states usually won't ask the lessee to open their books completely which would have been the only way to really chase the money here prior to agreeing to the lease. As with anything, of course, a thick layer of fleece can be used to get a deal to happen, so maybe that happened here but my gut tells me that Florida wanted the money and the jobs and this entity provided both (along with meeting the terms of state procurement). Either way, it's probably best for Florida to start some ejectment proceedings.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Cirrus, post: 175370, member: 10493"] If this is all true, it's bad and, depending on the terms of the lease, are cause for automatic termination of the agreement. I'm a bit skeptical only because this port is owned by a state agency. Most ports are owned and/or operated by the states with limited federal oversight unless something like the allegations made here arise. In agreeing to common lease terms, states usually won't ask the lessee to open their books completely which would have been the only way to really chase the money here prior to agreeing to the lease. As with anything, of course, a thick layer of fleece can be used to get a deal to happen, so maybe that happened here but my gut tells me that Florida wanted the money and the jobs and this entity provided both (along with meeting the terms of state procurement). Either way, it's probably best for Florida to start some ejectment proceedings. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Conspiracies & Cover-ups
Project Pelican
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top