Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Time Travel Forum
Time Travelers
Re : Chris situation
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Unintentional" data-source="post: 9940" data-attributes="member: 22"><p><strong>Re : Chris situation</strong></p><p></p><p>Even Steven Hawking subscribes to the multi universe theory and not just the string theory aspect (although he does support that also).</p><p></p><p>As speeds increase, to the travelor, nothing is a miss. To observers objects that are sped up appear elongated. This could be said to be space collapsing. If something was going very very near the speed of light to observers the object would appear to be a long skinny string. This has been proven. The more accurate your measuring equipment the less speed increase is needed to observe it. Just as two planes traveling different directions will have lost or increased their onboard time a few seconds every couple of months, race cars when measured by observers do "colapse" their space by a few micrometers. I throw in the time dilations by airplanes to show a sense of scale. A few seconds a couple of months and a few micrometers are very very very small changes that can be observed and measure macroscopically, but they ARE there to be measured. In labortories where they can speed particles to very very near the speed of light, the collapsing of space and dilation of time are much much greater. As particles approach the speed of light they become slower and slower in time to the observer and appear longer and longer to a point stretched out.</p><p></p><p>Steven Hawking has one theory of time travel (he has many) that is attributed to the uncertainity principal. We are the sum averages of our measurements and the more accuatedly we know our speed, the lest accurately we know our position. If you acknowledge that we can not exceed the speed of light, then by going very near the speed of light and knowing our position very very accurately some of us MUST be going back in time because we are the average of our speeds. To have an average near the speed of light some of us must be going slower but since none of use can be going faster (impossible to break speed of light), some of us must be going BACKWARDS in time!</p><p></p><p>I have had many thoughts about Chris. It is theoretically possible that anything is possible. It has been proven mathematically with quatum theory that if every one on earth started bumbing up against a wall continuously for the next two years at least one person would certainly "pop" through to the other side magically passing through the wall without harming the wall or the person. What I am getting at is with the infinite randomness of the universe and the many many theories of time travel and multi universes, that given enough time and people what happens microscopically all the time will eventually happen macroscopically to a person. It might be once every few years or once every million years, but it WILL eventually happen. Particlesa have been observed to teleport from one place to another microscopically constantly and frequently. These events become more and more unlikely the bigger the object, but they NEVER become a zero chance.</p><p></p><p>Chris is simply the macroscopic manifistation of that not quite zero chance of a macroscopic object teleporting 10 years into the future.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Unintentional, post: 9940, member: 22"] [b]Re : Chris situation[/b] Even Steven Hawking subscribes to the multi universe theory and not just the string theory aspect (although he does support that also). As speeds increase, to the travelor, nothing is a miss. To observers objects that are sped up appear elongated. This could be said to be space collapsing. If something was going very very near the speed of light to observers the object would appear to be a long skinny string. This has been proven. The more accurate your measuring equipment the less speed increase is needed to observe it. Just as two planes traveling different directions will have lost or increased their onboard time a few seconds every couple of months, race cars when measured by observers do "colapse" their space by a few micrometers. I throw in the time dilations by airplanes to show a sense of scale. A few seconds a couple of months and a few micrometers are very very very small changes that can be observed and measure macroscopically, but they ARE there to be measured. In labortories where they can speed particles to very very near the speed of light, the collapsing of space and dilation of time are much much greater. As particles approach the speed of light they become slower and slower in time to the observer and appear longer and longer to a point stretched out. Steven Hawking has one theory of time travel (he has many) that is attributed to the uncertainity principal. We are the sum averages of our measurements and the more accuatedly we know our speed, the lest accurately we know our position. If you acknowledge that we can not exceed the speed of light, then by going very near the speed of light and knowing our position very very accurately some of us MUST be going back in time because we are the average of our speeds. To have an average near the speed of light some of us must be going slower but since none of use can be going faster (impossible to break speed of light), some of us must be going BACKWARDS in time! I have had many thoughts about Chris. It is theoretically possible that anything is possible. It has been proven mathematically with quatum theory that if every one on earth started bumbing up against a wall continuously for the next two years at least one person would certainly "pop" through to the other side magically passing through the wall without harming the wall or the person. What I am getting at is with the infinite randomness of the universe and the many many theories of time travel and multi universes, that given enough time and people what happens microscopically all the time will eventually happen macroscopically to a person. It might be once every few years or once every million years, but it WILL eventually happen. Particlesa have been observed to teleport from one place to another microscopically constantly and frequently. These events become more and more unlikely the bigger the object, but they NEVER become a zero chance. Chris is simply the macroscopic manifistation of that not quite zero chance of a macroscopic object teleporting 10 years into the future. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Time Travel Forum
Time Travelers
Re : Chris situation
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top