Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Time Travel Forum
John Titor's Legacy
Ren poses as John Titor on Jimmy Church Radio
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Sanyam Deshi" data-source="post: 94141" data-attributes="member: 5926"><p>You're completely twisting my words to let your counterarguments work.</p><p></p><p>The first problem that you have made is that you assume that I share the opinions with the others in this conversation. Unless I'm being forgetful, I have not called him delusional at any point in this conversation. Others may have implied this, but I do not necessarily agree with this notion.</p><p></p><p></p><p>I <strong>knew </strong>someone was going to pull the discrimination card based on this. I very clearly stated that I respect everyone's beliefs and that my problem was with <em>how </em>he is spreading his views, not the fact that he's spreading them. If he wanted to post a thread about that Egypt stuff so people could discuss it, I'd be fine with that. Instead, he chooses to come up with some pretend event. That freedom of speech comment is pointless because I'm not denying his right to talk. People learn what is socially acceptable through conditioning created by how society responds. Honestly, I don't expect to make any progress here. Sometimes, I "beat a dead horse" for fun.</p><p></p><p></p><p>My whole point about making this comment was to theorize that he is trying to gain publicity. I'm completely aware that Ren wasn't calling himself John Titor, but if everyone was aware of this, nobody would be scolding Ren for calling himself John Titor. To me, this seems to be a cop out. Ren had no good reason to call himself "John Titor II" on the radio show, but by doing so, he potentially gains publicity, as to many, John Titor is a popular Internet icon. This results in boosted search results. Ren seemed to be purposefully unclear in explaining that he is not John Titor, as Jimmy Church seemed quite confused himself.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Sanyam Deshi, post: 94141, member: 5926"] You're completely twisting my words to let your counterarguments work. The first problem that you have made is that you assume that I share the opinions with the others in this conversation. Unless I'm being forgetful, I have not called him delusional at any point in this conversation. Others may have implied this, but I do not necessarily agree with this notion. I [B]knew [/B]someone was going to pull the discrimination card based on this. I very clearly stated that I respect everyone's beliefs and that my problem was with [I]how [/I]he is spreading his views, not the fact that he's spreading them. If he wanted to post a thread about that Egypt stuff so people could discuss it, I'd be fine with that. Instead, he chooses to come up with some pretend event. That freedom of speech comment is pointless because I'm not denying his right to talk. People learn what is socially acceptable through conditioning created by how society responds. Honestly, I don't expect to make any progress here. Sometimes, I "beat a dead horse" for fun. My whole point about making this comment was to theorize that he is trying to gain publicity. I'm completely aware that Ren wasn't calling himself John Titor, but if everyone was aware of this, nobody would be scolding Ren for calling himself John Titor. To me, this seems to be a cop out. Ren had no good reason to call himself "John Titor II" on the radio show, but by doing so, he potentially gains publicity, as to many, John Titor is a popular Internet icon. This results in boosted search results. Ren seemed to be purposefully unclear in explaining that he is not John Titor, as Jimmy Church seemed quite confused himself. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Time Travel Forum
John Titor's Legacy
Ren poses as John Titor on Jimmy Church Radio
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top