Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Time Travel Forum
Time Travel Discussion
Ren's General Comments
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Rosco..Jones" data-source="post: 47661" data-attributes="member: 2729"><p><span style="font-family: 'arial black'"><span style="font-size: 15px">Hey Ren, </span></span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'arial black'"><span style="font-size: 15px">Still working on an overall summary. I think first it would be a good start to focus on some specific sections and concepts.</span></span></p><p></p><p><span style="font-family: 'arial black'"><span style="font-size: 15px">I chose this section because I had similar views on the nature of light before I read this. </span></span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'arial black'"><span style="font-size: 15px">Note: Quintessences below in [0060] are a Planck mass<span style="color: #33cccc">*</span>. Sorry the formulas did not transfer.</span></span></p><p></p><p>Time Travel Patent Application sections 0057-0060</p><p> </p><p><span style="font-family: 'arial black'"><span style="font-size: 15px"><strong>[0057]</strong> <strong>The Space-Time Lattice</strong> </span></span></p><p></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px"><span style="font-family: 'arial black'"> <strong>[0058]</strong> The understanding of the true nature of space-time and how’ it is formulated in three dimensions of real space is crucial. To simply assume that space-time exists, and thence not to question the nature of that existence, denies a deeper understanding of the universe. </span></span></p><p></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px"><span style="font-family: 'arial black'"> <strong>[0059]</strong> <span style="color: #888888">In order to understand the nature of space-lime itself, at the quantum level a further look at the nature light and the photon is necessary. Since Einstein’s description of light as a particle (the photon) and the description of the photoelectric effect, the standard picture of light as simply a wave can, no longer be applied. If light was to exist as a photon, it could not exist in one dimension, as ordinary waves do. It would need to be three dimensional, with the addition of time. Let us suppose, in this case, that a photon is a three dimensional helical ringlet of light, traveling in the x vector, and spinning around the x-axis. Conventionally this ringlet has a radius; </span><span style="color: #888888">r=Lambda/2 pie. The ringlet itself would he vibrating in the y and z vectors. The vectors x, y and z would represent the photon. The substance of which, would he traveling in the x direction and oscillating in the y and z vectors, which would represent oscillatory energy. This in turn would allow it to act as a wave, and create oscillatory electromagnetic fields. </span></span></span></p><p></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px"><span style="font-family: 'arial black'"> <strong>[0060]</strong> It is important to re-examine space-time itself in this light, this would have one directional vector with two vector dimensions of energy, one of capacitance and one of electrical permeability, thus accounting for the well-known constants of free space, the permittivity of free space and the permeability of free space 4D respectively. The vector dimension of direction x, would be the direction of travel and those “quintessences” traveling in an outwardly direction would account for none other than the expansion of the universe. </span></span></p><p> </p><p><span style="font-size: 15px"><span style="font-family: 'arial black'">Three of these quintessences would naturally constitute three dimensional visible space-time. These constituents of space-time would interact with the generations of the other vector dimensions reciprocally. Thus one quintessence would sweep out one vector of (Lambda sub zero) permeability and one vector of (mu sub zero) permeability, through which the other two quintessences could travel, and vice-verse, creating a three dimensional space-time lattice.</span></span></p><p></p><p><span style="font-family: 'arial black'"><span style="font-size: 15px">My Comments</span></span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'arial black'"><span style="font-size: 15px">In [0059] a photon is described as <span style="color: #888888">a three dimensional helical ringlet of light, traveling in the x vector, and spinning around the x-axis. </span>The way I saw this was the photon is orbiting a Planck mass nucleus in the y and z vectors, perpendicular to the x vector line of travel. This would form the 3D helical nature of the photons as the pair travel at C velocity. The frequency/wavelength would be determined by the Planck mass size of the nucleus and the resultant change in the radius of the orbital. Viewed in a 3D frame, this would appear as a standard oscillating sine wave.</span></span></p><p> </p><p><span style="font-family: 'arial black'"><span style="font-size: 15px"><span style="color: #33cccc">*Planck Mass</span> - The Planck mass is not the elusive particle so often depicted, but it is the constituent part of each electron and neutrino. If the Planck mass is considered as a charged black hole, we find that the electron mass and charge are a natural corollary. The faster the rotation of the Planck mass the lower its measurable mass appears to be: at the speed of light we are left with a massless and chargeless particle that is identified with the neutrino and an extension in our world of such mass decrease is investigated. Finally, the interaction of the Planck</span><span style="font-size: 15px"> charge with virtual particles present in the vacuum seems to yield the right charge for the d-quark and a negative fine structure constant seems to imply a <span style="color: #33cccc">speed faster than light</span>. So the reason the Planck mass is large is the same as the statement of the "hierarchy problem"; why is gravity so much weaker than the quantum forces represented by Compton? </span></span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'arial black'"><span style="font-size: 15px">The Randall-Sundrum model gives one <em>possible</em> explanation: quantum forces are carried by open strings confined to a "brane" (our observable spacetime), while gravity is carried by closed strings that can move off the brane into a larger dimensional space called the "bulk", so we see less gravitons than we do quanta of standard model forces because some of the gravitons are outside our visible universe.</span></span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Rosco..Jones, post: 47661, member: 2729"] [FONT=arial black][SIZE=4]Hey Ren, [/SIZE][/FONT] [FONT=arial black][SIZE=4]Still working on an overall summary. I think first it would be a good start to focus on some specific sections and concepts.[/SIZE][/FONT] [FONT=arial black][SIZE=4]I chose this section because I had similar views on the nature of light before I read this. [/SIZE][/FONT] [FONT=arial black][SIZE=4]Note: Quintessences below in [0060] are a Planck mass[COLOR=#33cccc]*[/COLOR]. Sorry the formulas did not transfer.[/SIZE][/FONT] Time Travel Patent Application sections 0057-0060 [FONT=arial black][SIZE=4][B][0057][/B] [B]The Space-Time Lattice[/B] [/SIZE][/FONT] [SIZE=4][FONT=arial black] [B][0058][/B] The understanding of the true nature of space-time and how’ it is formulated in three dimensions of real space is crucial. To simply assume that space-time exists, and thence not to question the nature of that existence, denies a deeper understanding of the universe. [/FONT][/SIZE] [SIZE=4][FONT=arial black] [B][0059][/B] [COLOR=#888888]In order to understand the nature of space-lime itself, at the quantum level a further look at the nature light and the photon is necessary. Since Einstein’s description of light as a particle (the photon) and the description of the photoelectric effect, the standard picture of light as simply a wave can, no longer be applied. If light was to exist as a photon, it could not exist in one dimension, as ordinary waves do. It would need to be three dimensional, with the addition of time. Let us suppose, in this case, that a photon is a three dimensional helical ringlet of light, traveling in the x vector, and spinning around the x-axis. Conventionally this ringlet has a radius; [/COLOR][COLOR=#888888]r=Lambda/2 pie. The ringlet itself would he vibrating in the y and z vectors. The vectors x, y and z would represent the photon. The substance of which, would he traveling in the x direction and oscillating in the y and z vectors, which would represent oscillatory energy. This in turn would allow it to act as a wave, and create oscillatory electromagnetic fields. [/COLOR][/FONT][/SIZE] [SIZE=4][FONT=arial black] [B][0060][/B] It is important to re-examine space-time itself in this light, this would have one directional vector with two vector dimensions of energy, one of capacitance and one of electrical permeability, thus accounting for the well-known constants of free space, the permittivity of free space and the permeability of free space 4D respectively. The vector dimension of direction x, would be the direction of travel and those “quintessences” traveling in an outwardly direction would account for none other than the expansion of the universe. [/FONT][/SIZE] [SIZE=4][FONT=arial black]Three of these quintessences would naturally constitute three dimensional visible space-time. These constituents of space-time would interact with the generations of the other vector dimensions reciprocally. Thus one quintessence would sweep out one vector of (Lambda sub zero) permeability and one vector of (mu sub zero) permeability, through which the other two quintessences could travel, and vice-verse, creating a three dimensional space-time lattice.[/FONT][/SIZE] [FONT=arial black][SIZE=4]My Comments[/SIZE][/FONT] [FONT=arial black][SIZE=4]In [0059] a photon is described as [COLOR=#888888]a three dimensional helical ringlet of light, traveling in the x vector, and spinning around the x-axis. [/COLOR]The way I saw this was the photon is orbiting a Planck mass nucleus in the y and z vectors, perpendicular to the x vector line of travel. This would form the 3D helical nature of the photons as the pair travel at C velocity. The frequency/wavelength would be determined by the Planck mass size of the nucleus and the resultant change in the radius of the orbital. Viewed in a 3D frame, this would appear as a standard oscillating sine wave.[/SIZE][/FONT] [FONT=arial black][SIZE=4][COLOR=#33cccc]*Planck Mass[/COLOR] - The Planck mass is not the elusive particle so often depicted, but it is the constituent part of each electron and neutrino. If the Planck mass is considered as a charged black hole, we find that the electron mass and charge are a natural corollary. The faster the rotation of the Planck mass the lower its measurable mass appears to be: at the speed of light we are left with a massless and chargeless particle that is identified with the neutrino and an extension in our world of such mass decrease is investigated. Finally, the interaction of the Planck[/SIZE][SIZE=4] charge with virtual particles present in the vacuum seems to yield the right charge for the d-quark and a negative fine structure constant seems to imply a [COLOR=#33cccc]speed faster than light[/COLOR]. So the reason the Planck mass is large is the same as the statement of the "hierarchy problem"; why is gravity so much weaker than the quantum forces represented by Compton? [/SIZE][/FONT] [FONT=arial black][SIZE=4]The Randall-Sundrum model gives one [I]possible[/I] explanation: quantum forces are carried by open strings confined to a "brane" (our observable spacetime), while gravity is carried by closed strings that can move off the brane into a larger dimensional space called the "bulk", so we see less gravitons than we do quanta of standard model forces because some of the gravitons are outside our visible universe.[/SIZE][/FONT] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Time Travel Forum
Time Travel Discussion
Ren's General Comments
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top