Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Time Travel Forum
Time Travel Discussion
Revamping Meaning and Theory
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="tflofasho" data-source="post: 161488" data-attributes="member: 7714"><p>Velocity sounds like if movement was implied: but I simply meant direction as is; stationary; not implied movement.</p><p></p><p>Also I never considered nuclear forces as stationary potential energy; but I still consider gravity as a constant rotational force with motion. That's something to note and keep into consideration for creative catalystic tools to help perpetuate and activate a means like a magnet bullet train to go propel itself into a different dimension of swift speeds because of its overall combined rotational force of gravity being propelled at beyond fast light speeds curvilinearly opposes to the normal directional flow of time relative to the earth and sun martial spatial and geometric directional displacement.</p><p></p><p>What interesting is how that's similar to how we map motion on humans with 3 tools: isotonics wirh eccentric and concentric phases, isometrics and isokinestics of the biomechanical motion system; each one respectively talks about movement with tools that generates free range of motion, static stability and balance static motion where no movement is being made and where you move at the same speeds with various strengths of forces no matter what. We talk about those physics concepts.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>But how about something that goes the opposite like a rewind or going back as if your going forward relative to yourself?</p><p></p><p>I think the mapping of the human directional atlas is good enough. The question is: what do we use as a baseline and constant anchor to use as a standard and fallback to help calibrate a perfect scale to test measure and quantify a way to create a learning curve tool to actually get to that point over tie and actually refine and efficiently finish itself to get the job done as to what it's supposed to go do after being tested for reliability and validity? You know? We need a 0 point to calibrate the scale and go on from there; if we don't have a baseline; we'll all get lost.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="tflofasho, post: 161488, member: 7714"] Velocity sounds like if movement was implied: but I simply meant direction as is; stationary; not implied movement. Also I never considered nuclear forces as stationary potential energy; but I still consider gravity as a constant rotational force with motion. That's something to note and keep into consideration for creative catalystic tools to help perpetuate and activate a means like a magnet bullet train to go propel itself into a different dimension of swift speeds because of its overall combined rotational force of gravity being propelled at beyond fast light speeds curvilinearly opposes to the normal directional flow of time relative to the earth and sun martial spatial and geometric directional displacement. What interesting is how that's similar to how we map motion on humans with 3 tools: isotonics wirh eccentric and concentric phases, isometrics and isokinestics of the biomechanical motion system; each one respectively talks about movement with tools that generates free range of motion, static stability and balance static motion where no movement is being made and where you move at the same speeds with various strengths of forces no matter what. We talk about those physics concepts. But how about something that goes the opposite like a rewind or going back as if your going forward relative to yourself? I think the mapping of the human directional atlas is good enough. The question is: what do we use as a baseline and constant anchor to use as a standard and fallback to help calibrate a perfect scale to test measure and quantify a way to create a learning curve tool to actually get to that point over tie and actually refine and efficiently finish itself to get the job done as to what it's supposed to go do after being tested for reliability and validity? You know? We need a 0 point to calibrate the scale and go on from there; if we don't have a baseline; we'll all get lost. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Time Travel Forum
Time Travel Discussion
Revamping Meaning and Theory
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top