Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Time Travel Forum
Time Machines & Experiments
Rotating Gravity Field
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Einstein" data-source="post: 139751" data-attributes="member: 288"><p>With GPS the radio wave frequencies do change. But relativity wasn't used to calibrate the clocks on board the GPS sattelites. The clocks are periodically updated with a ground station. Civilian use is only accurate to around a meter. But military use updates the clocks more frequently to allow for an accuracy rate of + or - a millimeter. </p><p></p><p>Atomic clocks are only accurate in a stable non-moving enviroment. They tick faster when further away from a gravitational body. Verified! But supposedly they click slower in the presence of an inertial force. That is a relativity prediction. I'm not so apt to believe that, since no data has been gathered outside the presence of a gravitational body to verify it. </p><p></p><p>The problem with atomic clocks is that it hasn't been shown that there is a connection to the time force. </p><p></p><p>I can show that a digital watch will tick faster when held close to a Tesla coil in operation. But no effect at all on a mechanical watch. Yet a quartz driven mechanical movement watch is very susceptable to AC magnetic fields. </p><p></p><p>So it appears that time behaves differently depending on the individual type of force being used to generate the time base.</p><p></p><p>It seems to me that one must master the use of the individual forces in order to access the time force. Quite possibly this would be a device utilizing a phased synchronized relationship between all of the basic forces. </p><p></p><p>If you're interested, I have a simple thought experiment that simply destroys relativity and Newton's laws in one fell swoop. After which you will probably look at theories with a grain of salt from that point on.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Einstein, post: 139751, member: 288"] With GPS the radio wave frequencies do change. But relativity wasn't used to calibrate the clocks on board the GPS sattelites. The clocks are periodically updated with a ground station. Civilian use is only accurate to around a meter. But military use updates the clocks more frequently to allow for an accuracy rate of + or - a millimeter. Atomic clocks are only accurate in a stable non-moving enviroment. They tick faster when further away from a gravitational body. Verified! But supposedly they click slower in the presence of an inertial force. That is a relativity prediction. I'm not so apt to believe that, since no data has been gathered outside the presence of a gravitational body to verify it. The problem with atomic clocks is that it hasn't been shown that there is a connection to the time force. I can show that a digital watch will tick faster when held close to a Tesla coil in operation. But no effect at all on a mechanical watch. Yet a quartz driven mechanical movement watch is very susceptable to AC magnetic fields. So it appears that time behaves differently depending on the individual type of force being used to generate the time base. It seems to me that one must master the use of the individual forces in order to access the time force. Quite possibly this would be a device utilizing a phased synchronized relationship between all of the basic forces. If you're interested, I have a simple thought experiment that simply destroys relativity and Newton's laws in one fell swoop. After which you will probably look at theories with a grain of salt from that point on. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Time Travel Forum
Time Machines & Experiments
Rotating Gravity Field
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top