Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Time Travel Forum
Time Machines & Experiments
Scientific reasons why Bajak Flux Capactor should work
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Sonix" data-source="post: 185348" data-attributes="member: 10954"><p>[USER=6456]@TimeFlipper[/USER] , you are referring to "your thread heading" but this thread was started and titled by [USER=13]@Opmmur[/USER] 7 years prior to me posting to it today, a post on which I made no claims to present the Scientific Reasons referred to in the thread header. I was merely posting the obituary of Bajak, as the question of his death was the last item posted on the thread. I cannot imagine how you can reach the conclusion that it is unlikely that I will build the Bajak circuit or that I would "try desperately to make out that you actually did Time-Travel". That is presumptive and insulting. You have no basis at all for these conclusions. The anomalous effects reported about the Delta Time Generator were reported by Al Bielek and you, and that is enough for me to move forward on building your circuit and experimenting with it, but you are ridiculing me for considering to experiment with it on that basis when you yourself would had less to go on when you built your own circuit? You build the circuit and it's reasonable; I build the circuit after you and it is only because of my wishful thinking? That explanation given by Bielek in that video does not qualify as what would be considered "credible scientific explanation" regardless of what credibility you or I may give it - this and other devices on this site would not be generally considered kook pseudo-science if Bielek's explanations were considered mainstream science. If you want to accuse people you do not know of being insincere and likely deluded with no basis other than their expressed willingness to experiment with these circuits, continue on. I will not be engaging any further in debate with you about this.</p><p></p><p>Correction: Meant to refer to Nichols, not Bielek in the video.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Sonix, post: 185348, member: 10954"] [USER=6456]@TimeFlipper[/USER] , you are referring to "your thread heading" but this thread was started and titled by [USER=13]@Opmmur[/USER] 7 years prior to me posting to it today, a post on which I made no claims to present the Scientific Reasons referred to in the thread header. I was merely posting the obituary of Bajak, as the question of his death was the last item posted on the thread. I cannot imagine how you can reach the conclusion that it is unlikely that I will build the Bajak circuit or that I would "try desperately to make out that you actually did Time-Travel". That is presumptive and insulting. You have no basis at all for these conclusions. The anomalous effects reported about the Delta Time Generator were reported by Al Bielek and you, and that is enough for me to move forward on building your circuit and experimenting with it, but you are ridiculing me for considering to experiment with it on that basis when you yourself would had less to go on when you built your own circuit? You build the circuit and it's reasonable; I build the circuit after you and it is only because of my wishful thinking? That explanation given by Bielek in that video does not qualify as what would be considered "credible scientific explanation" regardless of what credibility you or I may give it - this and other devices on this site would not be generally considered kook pseudo-science if Bielek's explanations were considered mainstream science. If you want to accuse people you do not know of being insincere and likely deluded with no basis other than their expressed willingness to experiment with these circuits, continue on. I will not be engaging any further in debate with you about this. Correction: Meant to refer to Nichols, not Bielek in the video. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Time Travel Forum
Time Machines & Experiments
Scientific reasons why Bajak Flux Capactor should work
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top