Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Time Travel Forum
Time Machines & Experiments
Small lecture on time station math
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="lamdo263" data-source="post: 212229" data-attributes="member: 259"><p>I will settle on it was an era misanthropes, or a failure of being able to express the necessary wanted technology for the time. Remember now, Leibniz tried to befriend Thomas Jefferson and this attempt had failed. During that time, they had mechanical calculating engines, however the capacity of those machines being able to express themselves within the three D graphics, were nil.</p><p></p><p>In essence what I feel Pierre Fermat had done, was say goodbye to the limitations of that time's ability, to portray a math problem more fully. Although E'variste Galois was a dramatic touch to the Fermat Equation, his comments weren't eve necessary, or required. All show, song and dance. Incidental music, added to a limitation clause.</p><p></p><p>It was the lack of the development of a peripheral. You can prove this to yourself by taking a 1950s television set, that you know that works.</p><p></p><p>Place this TV in a room with a chair in front of the TV set. Now make sure that the TV works. Does it?, great fine. Now turn the TV off and sit in that chair in front of the television set.</p><p></p><p>The key question is, what does the TV set do when it's turned off ? This is complex, so you might want to take notes.</p><p></p><p>Know that the computer terminal screen, was not more fully developed till the 1980s. Ask yourself, how much time was that after Pierre De' Fermat passed on. How many eras had come and gone and still not peripheral to what came to be known as the computer?</p><p></p><p>I was taught that E'varisti bragged that he could solve the Fermat equation and one thing led to another and he ended up in a duel.</p><p></p><p>[URL unfurl="true"]https://www.discovermagazine.com/the-sciences/mysterious-death-of-a-mathematician-finally-solved[/URL]</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="lamdo263, post: 212229, member: 259"] I will settle on it was an era misanthropes, or a failure of being able to express the necessary wanted technology for the time. Remember now, Leibniz tried to befriend Thomas Jefferson and this attempt had failed. During that time, they had mechanical calculating engines, however the capacity of those machines being able to express themselves within the three D graphics, were nil. In essence what I feel Pierre Fermat had done, was say goodbye to the limitations of that time's ability, to portray a math problem more fully. Although E'variste Galois was a dramatic touch to the Fermat Equation, his comments weren't eve necessary, or required. All show, song and dance. Incidental music, added to a limitation clause. It was the lack of the development of a peripheral. You can prove this to yourself by taking a 1950s television set, that you know that works. Place this TV in a room with a chair in front of the TV set. Now make sure that the TV works. Does it?, great fine. Now turn the TV off and sit in that chair in front of the television set. The key question is, what does the TV set do when it's turned off ? This is complex, so you might want to take notes. Know that the computer terminal screen, was not more fully developed till the 1980s. Ask yourself, how much time was that after Pierre De' Fermat passed on. How many eras had come and gone and still not peripheral to what came to be known as the computer? I was taught that E'varisti bragged that he could solve the Fermat equation and one thing led to another and he ended up in a duel. [URL unfurl="true"]https://www.discovermagazine.com/the-sciences/mysterious-death-of-a-mathematician-finally-solved[/URL] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Time Travel Forum
Time Machines & Experiments
Small lecture on time station math
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top