Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Time Travel Forum
Time Machines & Experiments
Small lecture on time station math
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="lamdo263" data-source="post: 212252" data-attributes="member: 259"><p>You're free to do whatever you want to do. I had read in a couple of books. Galois had an insatiable ego, that he could solve the problem. Which at the time probably nobody could.</p><p></p><p>Like I said, this all rested with Fermat. Why would he post a math problem that nobody at the time could solve? If you read Simon Singh's version of the problem, by instinct he does go into cube roots. This is why I think the statement of the problem, was more of less similar to H.P. Barnum's statement, come see the egress. However Fermat did not have Barnum's flair for the dramatic, to sell the simple.</p><p></p><p>When Hamilton discovered the British version of algebra, he stated that all of a sudden he could see the images he wanted to see placed upon the understructure wall of a bridge, that had a pedestrian walkway that crossed beneath that bridge.</p><p></p><p>What they were looking for then, was a way to express themselves, in a way that involved emotion, but emotion did not quite cover it. What was needed then, was a device to where they could illustrate what each person had visualized. This I feel is why Fermat said what he did.</p><p></p><p>*What I have said here, serves as a time station, or a place of progress noted, by character within any civilization.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="lamdo263, post: 212252, member: 259"] You're free to do whatever you want to do. I had read in a couple of books. Galois had an insatiable ego, that he could solve the problem. Which at the time probably nobody could. Like I said, this all rested with Fermat. Why would he post a math problem that nobody at the time could solve? If you read Simon Singh's version of the problem, by instinct he does go into cube roots. This is why I think the statement of the problem, was more of less similar to H.P. Barnum's statement, come see the egress. However Fermat did not have Barnum's flair for the dramatic, to sell the simple. When Hamilton discovered the British version of algebra, he stated that all of a sudden he could see the images he wanted to see placed upon the understructure wall of a bridge, that had a pedestrian walkway that crossed beneath that bridge. What they were looking for then, was a way to express themselves, in a way that involved emotion, but emotion did not quite cover it. What was needed then, was a device to where they could illustrate what each person had visualized. This I feel is why Fermat said what he did. *What I have said here, serves as a time station, or a place of progress noted, by character within any civilization. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Time Travel Forum
Time Machines & Experiments
Small lecture on time station math
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top