Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
General Discussion Forum
General Discussion
Talk in questions.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="CaryP" data-source="post: 4312" data-attributes="member: 34"><p><strong>Talk in questions.</strong></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>And who would fund this "federally funded" election campaign? Wouldn't the American taxpayer get saddled with the cost?</p><p></p><p>How would the funds be divided? Would any lunatic be able to get an equal amount of federal funds for their campaign? Would the legitimate third parties get the short shrift?</p><p></p><p>Wouldn't the wealthy corporatists find a way to continue "buying" politicians anyway? Haven't they always?</p><p></p><p>Wouldn't we have more of the same if the federal govt. make a bureacracy of the elections like everything else they touch?</p><p></p><p>Wouldn't it be better to limit total contributions received and total money spent to something like $5 million per campaign with no carry over to future campaigns and limiting individual contributions to $100? Wouldn't it be great if any excess contributions received and not spent had to be refunded proportionatley to ALL contributors?</p><p></p><p>Wouldn't it be better if all political action committees would be banned along with "soft" money raised and spent?</p><p></p><p>Wouldn't it be better if foreign contributions were punishable by death for treason?</p><p></p><p>Have I made my point clear enough for you?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="CaryP, post: 4312, member: 34"] [b]Talk in questions.[/b] And who would fund this "federally funded" election campaign? Wouldn't the American taxpayer get saddled with the cost? How would the funds be divided? Would any lunatic be able to get an equal amount of federal funds for their campaign? Would the legitimate third parties get the short shrift? Wouldn't the wealthy corporatists find a way to continue "buying" politicians anyway? Haven't they always? Wouldn't we have more of the same if the federal govt. make a bureacracy of the elections like everything else they touch? Wouldn't it be better to limit total contributions received and total money spent to something like $5 million per campaign with no carry over to future campaigns and limiting individual contributions to $100? Wouldn't it be great if any excess contributions received and not spent had to be refunded proportionatley to ALL contributors? Wouldn't it be better if all political action committees would be banned along with "soft" money raised and spent? Wouldn't it be better if foreign contributions were punishable by death for treason? Have I made my point clear enough for you? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
General Discussion Forum
General Discussion
Talk in questions.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top