Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Conspiracies & Cover-ups
Terrorist Attacks
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Grayson" data-source="post: 3651" data-attributes="member: 18"><p><strong>Terrorist Attacks</strong></p><p></p><p>Firstly, Phoenix, enable the COPPRA registration process. We then know who the Minor's are.</p><p></p><p>Secondly. In my understanding of UK Law, which isn't too disimilar to many Western Legal systems, there has to be defined and achievable Criminal Intent in order for the FBI, MI6 or Interpol to become involved.</p><p></p><p>What is Criminal Intent? This is the intention to commit a criminal, not civil, act which is by definition of the Court's Illegal. There must also be an achievable method of sponsoring this Criminal Intent. It is not sufficient to say that you are going to kill Arch-Duke Ferdinand, as that can be seen as and argued as mere expression of Intent to commit murder. This is like saying that the next time you see Billy Bully, you are going to hit him. A lot can happen between the expression and the actual act.</p><p></p><p>To say that you have purchased a Dragunov SVD Sniper Rifle and when Arch-Duke Ferdinand visits Sarajevo next week you will wait in the bell-tower across the street and shoot him, expresses actual Intent and defines the mechanism by which you will do it.</p><p></p><p>Which one would set your alarm bells off?</p><p></p><p>The argument must then move on to the involvement of this Board in either scenario.</p><p></p><p>I leave it to some debate afore continuing.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Grayson, post: 3651, member: 18"] [b]Terrorist Attacks[/b] Firstly, Phoenix, enable the COPPRA registration process. We then know who the Minor's are. Secondly. In my understanding of UK Law, which isn't too disimilar to many Western Legal systems, there has to be defined and achievable Criminal Intent in order for the FBI, MI6 or Interpol to become involved. What is Criminal Intent? This is the intention to commit a criminal, not civil, act which is by definition of the Court's Illegal. There must also be an achievable method of sponsoring this Criminal Intent. It is not sufficient to say that you are going to kill Arch-Duke Ferdinand, as that can be seen as and argued as mere expression of Intent to commit murder. This is like saying that the next time you see Billy Bully, you are going to hit him. A lot can happen between the expression and the actual act. To say that you have purchased a Dragunov SVD Sniper Rifle and when Arch-Duke Ferdinand visits Sarajevo next week you will wait in the bell-tower across the street and shoot him, expresses actual Intent and defines the mechanism by which you will do it. Which one would set your alarm bells off? The argument must then move on to the involvement of this Board in either scenario. I leave it to some debate afore continuing. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Conspiracies & Cover-ups
Terrorist Attacks
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top