Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Time Travel Forum
Time Travel Discussion
The Creation of Man
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dmitri" data-source="post: 15989" data-attributes="member: 397"><p><strong>Re: The Creation of Man</strong></p><p></p><p>StarLord,</p><p>I like your analogy with oil and water. When you mix them you lose the track of the origins. I guess consistency in quantum physics is strange but nice. I like the symmetry of future and past; I also like to think that plants can somehow feel the future; good for them, because they cannot move and are bound to a place for often a hundred years or more. The book by F. Hoyle, which I highly recommend, gives more of a theoretical physicist?s insights into the nature of life, its origins and evolution. I thought viral upgrades are needed to support integrity of life systems, he says the information from the future can be used besides. This is by far the best (if not the only) book on theoretical biology that I have read. I am for more directed ways of evolution though. He suggests new genes like cosmic rain: many get many. I think ETs are more specific; genome comparisons should show. The thing is, this 95%+ of non-protein-coding DNA in the genomes, which was regarded redundant or silent until very recently, turns out now to be, almost all of it, expressed at RNA level. This points out to much higher specificity of genomes hence much more careful assembly of them, not like throw them a bunch, and some will grow in something.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dmitri, post: 15989, member: 397"] [b]Re: The Creation of Man[/b] StarLord, I like your analogy with oil and water. When you mix them you lose the track of the origins. I guess consistency in quantum physics is strange but nice. I like the symmetry of future and past; I also like to think that plants can somehow feel the future; good for them, because they cannot move and are bound to a place for often a hundred years or more. The book by F. Hoyle, which I highly recommend, gives more of a theoretical physicist?s insights into the nature of life, its origins and evolution. I thought viral upgrades are needed to support integrity of life systems, he says the information from the future can be used besides. This is by far the best (if not the only) book on theoretical biology that I have read. I am for more directed ways of evolution though. He suggests new genes like cosmic rain: many get many. I think ETs are more specific; genome comparisons should show. The thing is, this 95%+ of non-protein-coding DNA in the genomes, which was regarded redundant or silent until very recently, turns out now to be, almost all of it, expressed at RNA level. This points out to much higher specificity of genomes hence much more careful assembly of them, not like throw them a bunch, and some will grow in something. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Time Travel Forum
Time Travel Discussion
The Creation of Man
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top