Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Time Travel Forum
Time Travel Discussion
The Creation of Man
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dmitri" data-source="post: 16895" data-attributes="member: 397"><p><strong>Re: The Creation of Man</strong></p><p></p><p>There is little new in what I propose. Darwinism was shown unscientific by a good number of people. I forgot to add to the list of the two books I mentioned above Steele?s ?Lamarck?s signature?. Panspermia is an old idea, revitalized by Francis Crick, for example, see his 1981 "Life Itself". Commemorates are many, and many mention this idea of his, e.g. at <a href="http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/nation/20040729-701-040729crick.html" target="_blank"><span style="font-family: 'Arial'">http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/nation/20040729-701-040729crick.html</span></a><span style="font-family: 'Arial'"> One may safely call him the greatest biologist of the last century. He was the DNA structure discoverer, with Watson, outstanding brain researcher, and exceptional educator. </span></p><p></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Arial'">Among possible explanations of life, since we do not have a theory, only sketchy hypotheses, I would first consider a structural approach: there is something in the genomes that directs, apart from the cell?s fate, the evolution of the organism through all the diverse type forms of life from bacteria to a vertebrate. It does not look good so far.</span></p><p></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Arial'">Directed panspermia is a kind of alternative. Suggest others, as many as you can: the theoretical biology book is open to everybody now: it is like a notebook, a couple of notes written in pencil, the rest is blank pages. (There are lots of books and papers on the theory of evolution, but you can safely archive 99.9% of them. Anyone?s notebook will be more important 4 sure) </span></p><p></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Arial'">If you consider directed panspermia, viruses is just the simplest way, and look sufficient to direct evolution. You do not need more complicated scenarios with UFOs landing and delivering everything still hot. </span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dmitri, post: 16895, member: 397"] [b]Re: The Creation of Man[/b] There is little new in what I propose. Darwinism was shown unscientific by a good number of people. I forgot to add to the list of the two books I mentioned above Steele?s ?Lamarck?s signature?. Panspermia is an old idea, revitalized by Francis Crick, for example, see his 1981 "Life Itself". Commemorates are many, and many mention this idea of his, e.g. at [url=http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/nation/20040729-701-040729crick.html][font=Arial]http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/nation/20040729-701-040729crick.html[/font][/url][font=Arial] One may safely call him the greatest biologist of the last century. He was the DNA structure discoverer, with Watson, outstanding brain researcher, and exceptional educator. [/font] [font=Arial]Among possible explanations of life, since we do not have a theory, only sketchy hypotheses, I would first consider a structural approach: there is something in the genomes that directs, apart from the cell?s fate, the evolution of the organism through all the diverse type forms of life from bacteria to a vertebrate. It does not look good so far.[/font] [font=Arial]Directed panspermia is a kind of alternative. Suggest others, as many as you can: the theoretical biology book is open to everybody now: it is like a notebook, a couple of notes written in pencil, the rest is blank pages. (There are lots of books and papers on the theory of evolution, but you can safely archive 99.9% of them. Anyone?s notebook will be more important 4 sure) [/font] [font=Arial]If you consider directed panspermia, viruses is just the simplest way, and look sufficient to direct evolution. You do not need more complicated scenarios with UFOs landing and delivering everything still hot. [/font] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Time Travel Forum
Time Travel Discussion
The Creation of Man
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top