Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Time Travel Forum
Time Travel Discussion
The Creation of Man
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Harte" data-source="post: 16958" data-attributes="member: 443"><p><strong>Re: The Creation of Man</strong></p><p></p><p><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(\"Dmitri\")</div></p><p> </p><p>Physicists already know that the universe has physical existence at all it's times. Time and space cannot be untangled from each other. The two things are just two of the ways we view the same construct scientists call spacetime.</p><p> </p><p>It amuses me that so many are so quick to throw away evolution due to the lack of evidence only to embrace any other theory about which there exists absolutely no evidence.</p><p> </p><p>Dmitri, I submit to you that these time loops you postulate are not accepted at all in science. In fact, there is no information on the true nature of causality existant. What is accepted is the possibility of travel into the past and future. What effect this might have on causality is an unknown. That means that the "looping" part you refer to is pure speculation. I would like to see where this active debate is taking place given that no knowledge on causality actually exists.</p><p> </p><p>I am no champion of Darwin. As I said before I prefer to go with theories that have some evidence behind them. No one has witnessed the creation of new families in biology. The natural evolution of variants of species has been witnessed however. So at least some genetic change has taken place before our very eyes unaffected by any designer. Of course this does not explain the evolution of life and It's great diversity, but at least it shows some hope of possibly doing so in the future. I don't see how panspermia or ID provide any answers anyway. The life must have originated somewhere and please leave off with the time travellers did it hypothesis.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Harte, post: 16958, member: 443"] [b]Re: The Creation of Man[/b] <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(\"Dmitri\")</div> Physicists already know that the universe has physical existence at all it's times. Time and space cannot be untangled from each other. The two things are just two of the ways we view the same construct scientists call spacetime. It amuses me that so many are so quick to throw away evolution due to the lack of evidence only to embrace any other theory about which there exists absolutely no evidence. Dmitri, I submit to you that these time loops you postulate are not accepted at all in science. In fact, there is no information on the true nature of causality existant. What is accepted is the possibility of travel into the past and future. What effect this might have on causality is an unknown. That means that the "looping" part you refer to is pure speculation. I would like to see where this active debate is taking place given that no knowledge on causality actually exists. I am no champion of Darwin. As I said before I prefer to go with theories that have some evidence behind them. No one has witnessed the creation of new families in biology. The natural evolution of variants of species has been witnessed however. So at least some genetic change has taken place before our very eyes unaffected by any designer. Of course this does not explain the evolution of life and It's great diversity, but at least it shows some hope of possibly doing so in the future. I don't see how panspermia or ID provide any answers anyway. The life must have originated somewhere and please leave off with the time travellers did it hypothesis. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Time Travel Forum
Time Travel Discussion
The Creation of Man
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top