Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Conspiracies & Cover-ups
The Dark Side Of The Moon
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Heinrich Hundekok" data-source="post: 6152" data-attributes="member: 354"><p><strong>Re: The Dark Side Of The Moon</strong></p><p></p><p>Starlord, </p><p> </p><p>The moon probably does have a small iron/nickel core for all we know. As you say, not much sampling or drilling is done. </p><p>The main thing here is that you don't need to drill into an object to measure or figure out its mass. We know - or have made close appoximations to - the masses of all larger objects in our solar-system without ever having touched them. We can "measure" the mass of objects (planets) by looking at the way they influence each other through gravity. Making an artificial sattelite swing around them helps a lot, and the exploration of our solar system with probes have - also - resulted in much greater accuracy in our approximation of the masses of the sun and the planets.</p><p>In 1930 Pluto was discovered due to observed "anomalies" in uranus and neptunes trajectories. Not only was the existence of the new planet predicted through these anomalies, but also its mass and position in space could - to a degree - be determined mathematically.</p><p> </p><p>Reference:</p><p><a href="http://www.nasm.si.edu/research/ceps/etp/discovery/disc_planets.html" target="_blank">http://www.nasm.si.edu/research/ceps/etp/d...sc_planets.html</a></p><p> </p><p>As for the moon having ever had an atmosphere...</p><p> </p><p>No type of "clouds" could really prevent the diffusion of an atmosphere into space. Its not a soft transition like: the bigger a planet - the denser an atmosphere it can have. Its a knifes-edge: either it <em>can</em> have a dense atmosphere (escape velocity higher than the maximum speed of gas-particles at the surface) or it <em>cant</em>! </p><p> </p><p>The only way you could imagine the moon having ever had an atmosphere is that it had one at a time when the sun radiated off much less energy than now - say before it became a real fusion-plant. But that's theory beyond my capacity. You may be able to look it up somewhere.</p><p> </p><p>Still... the chances of native Selenites are still pretty thin. </p><p> </p><p>Ask your self: "Do I <em>want</em> there to have been life on the moon?" If the answer is either a clear "yes" or "no", then you should be very careful not to make that wish influence your judgement. </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>H.H.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Heinrich Hundekok, post: 6152, member: 354"] [b]Re: The Dark Side Of The Moon[/b] Starlord, The moon probably does have a small iron/nickel core for all we know. As you say, not much sampling or drilling is done. The main thing here is that you don't need to drill into an object to measure or figure out its mass. We know - or have made close appoximations to - the masses of all larger objects in our solar-system without ever having touched them. We can "measure" the mass of objects (planets) by looking at the way they influence each other through gravity. Making an artificial sattelite swing around them helps a lot, and the exploration of our solar system with probes have - also - resulted in much greater accuracy in our approximation of the masses of the sun and the planets. In 1930 Pluto was discovered due to observed "anomalies" in uranus and neptunes trajectories. Not only was the existence of the new planet predicted through these anomalies, but also its mass and position in space could - to a degree - be determined mathematically. Reference: [url=http://www.nasm.si.edu/research/ceps/etp/discovery/disc_planets.html]http://www.nasm.si.edu/research/ceps/etp/d...sc_planets.html[/url] As for the moon having ever had an atmosphere... No type of "clouds" could really prevent the diffusion of an atmosphere into space. Its not a soft transition like: the bigger a planet - the denser an atmosphere it can have. Its a knifes-edge: either it [i]can[/i] have a dense atmosphere (escape velocity higher than the maximum speed of gas-particles at the surface) or it [i]cant[/i]! The only way you could imagine the moon having ever had an atmosphere is that it had one at a time when the sun radiated off much less energy than now - say before it became a real fusion-plant. But that's theory beyond my capacity. You may be able to look it up somewhere. Still... the chances of native Selenites are still pretty thin. Ask your self: "Do I [i]want[/i] there to have been life on the moon?" If the answer is either a clear "yes" or "no", then you should be very careful not to make that wish influence your judgement. H.H. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Conspiracies & Cover-ups
The Dark Side Of The Moon
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top