Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Time Travel Forum
Alternate Histories & Timelines
The Four Seasons (band): Reinvented
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Doc Brown ish" data-source="post: 142033" data-attributes="member: 8561"><p>Hmm interesting subject, hope you guys don't mind if I chime in.</p><p>I've always been familiar with the four seasons as my dad was a fan so I grew hearing them a lot on long car journeys</p><p>My mum was the Beatles fan which I'm sure in part at least explains my dads liking for most bands that were not the Beatles haha.</p><p>I like them both but always preferred the Rolling Stones tbh, they had a dirtier sound.</p><p></p><p>I think I would like to keep history as it is on this one as the Beatles were so influential if you made the four seasons the more influential band what would happen to all the bands I loved who came after the Beatles and whom the Beatles were a major influence on? Would they cease to exist in our timeline?</p><p>I've never been a fan of elvis but even if I had a time machine I wouldn't want to meddle with history and displace him from his spot as the King of Rock and roll.. I would prefer people recognised chuck berry as the real originator of rock and roll and true king of rock and roll.</p><p>But no elvis means no Beatles and no Beatles means no multitude of bands I've loved throughout the intervening decades.</p><p></p><p>Anyway you wouldn't have to kill either John Lennon or Paul McCartney you could simply attempt to prevent them from meeting. If what I've read is true their meeting was quite by happenstance and could have easily have not happened.. A little intervention by a time traveler could probably alter history here without to much effort.</p><p></p><p>I've also read that John lennon and Paul mcCartneys accounts of how they met conflict, maybe it's a simple case of one of them altering the facts slightly many years later to try and highlight their own importortance in the early history of the band.. Or could it be a convergence of two timelines converged by a time traveller who has already meddled with history.</p><p></p><p>Maybe there was a timeline where Lennon and McCartney never met, in that timeline the four seasons may be the most influential band of the 60s and maybe in the years after they were a major influence on a multitude of bands we've never known.</p><p></p><p>A time traveller could have intervened to orchestrate John Lennon and Paul mcCartneys first meeting anticipating the outcome of converging two timelines at that juncture.</p><p></p><p>It's food for thought</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Doc Brown ish, post: 142033, member: 8561"] Hmm interesting subject, hope you guys don't mind if I chime in. I've always been familiar with the four seasons as my dad was a fan so I grew hearing them a lot on long car journeys My mum was the Beatles fan which I'm sure in part at least explains my dads liking for most bands that were not the Beatles haha. I like them both but always preferred the Rolling Stones tbh, they had a dirtier sound. I think I would like to keep history as it is on this one as the Beatles were so influential if you made the four seasons the more influential band what would happen to all the bands I loved who came after the Beatles and whom the Beatles were a major influence on? Would they cease to exist in our timeline? I've never been a fan of elvis but even if I had a time machine I wouldn't want to meddle with history and displace him from his spot as the King of Rock and roll.. I would prefer people recognised chuck berry as the real originator of rock and roll and true king of rock and roll. But no elvis means no Beatles and no Beatles means no multitude of bands I've loved throughout the intervening decades. Anyway you wouldn't have to kill either John Lennon or Paul McCartney you could simply attempt to prevent them from meeting. If what I've read is true their meeting was quite by happenstance and could have easily have not happened.. A little intervention by a time traveler could probably alter history here without to much effort. I've also read that John lennon and Paul mcCartneys accounts of how they met conflict, maybe it's a simple case of one of them altering the facts slightly many years later to try and highlight their own importortance in the early history of the band.. Or could it be a convergence of two timelines converged by a time traveller who has already meddled with history. Maybe there was a timeline where Lennon and McCartney never met, in that timeline the four seasons may be the most influential band of the 60s and maybe in the years after they were a major influence on a multitude of bands we've never known. A time traveller could have intervened to orchestrate John Lennon and Paul mcCartneys first meeting anticipating the outcome of converging two timelines at that juncture. It's food for thought [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Time Travel Forum
Alternate Histories & Timelines
The Four Seasons (band): Reinvented
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top