Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Time Travel Forum
Time Travel Discussion
The illusive Nature of Time
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="dimension-1hacker" data-source="post: 197872" data-attributes="member: 11791"><p>Obviously observed reality could be a fantasy because so far you have not bothered to try to disprove that, you might call that "nonsense" but if insults are the only proofs you can prove you are misleading yourself and cannot be helped; debates are the process of providing relavent proofs for or against. First, "shouldn't" a scientist or somebody that studies the scientific method recognise the inherent flaws of that system which not a philosophy that is meant to be used to prove that the observations are accurate, of course going on the assumption that your senses are not being alter which the person who wrote that philosophy specifically stated, which you should determine what is supposed to be obvious for yourself. That is not science's domain, other philosophies provide proofs for or against, instead of qouting from scientific theories that have no relavence qoute the actual philosophies for or against. It seems you do not know even the names of these philosophies yet hope that I am incorrect and try to convice yourself of that, well you know nothing of those philosophies so you have not questioned that much.</p><p>People who question a little are small, people that question their questions are medium, people that question everything are large.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="dimension-1hacker, post: 197872, member: 11791"] Obviously observed reality could be a fantasy because so far you have not bothered to try to disprove that, you might call that "nonsense" but if insults are the only proofs you can prove you are misleading yourself and cannot be helped; debates are the process of providing relavent proofs for or against. First, "shouldn't" a scientist or somebody that studies the scientific method recognise the inherent flaws of that system which not a philosophy that is meant to be used to prove that the observations are accurate, of course going on the assumption that your senses are not being alter which the person who wrote that philosophy specifically stated, which you should determine what is supposed to be obvious for yourself. That is not science's domain, other philosophies provide proofs for or against, instead of qouting from scientific theories that have no relavence qoute the actual philosophies for or against. It seems you do not know even the names of these philosophies yet hope that I am incorrect and try to convice yourself of that, well you know nothing of those philosophies so you have not questioned that much. People who question a little are small, people that question their questions are medium, people that question everything are large. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Time Travel Forum
Time Travel Discussion
The illusive Nature of Time
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top