Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Philosophy, Metaphysics & the Afterlife
The Life Spectrum Hypothesis
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dmitri" data-source="post: 12488" data-attributes="member: 397"><p><strong>Re: The Life Spectrum Hypothesis</strong></p><p></p><p>Hi,</p><p></p><p>I do not think this is serious. If the person were a physicist speculating about those analogies in the realm of waves and molecules, I would listen, not to this really. There are similar lines of argument in the anthropic principle discussions. I would count on known authorities in physics in those matters. E.g. Hoyle, Fred (1954), in Astrophysics Journal Supplement, Vol. I: "If you wanted to produce carbon and oxygen in roughly equal quantities by stellar nucleosynthesis, these are the two levels you would have to fix, and your fixing would have to be just about where these levels are actually found to be.... A commonsense interpretation of the facts suggests that a superintellect has monkeyed with physics, as well as chemistry and biology, and that there are no blind forces worth speaking about in nature." (p. 121) Nobody has observed any informational molecules to spontaneously form, even in their simplest species, and there no precursors of those molecules found in the known world. So why imagine chemical reactions becoming biological with no evidence at hand?</p><p></p><p>~D</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dmitri, post: 12488, member: 397"] [b]Re: The Life Spectrum Hypothesis[/b] Hi, I do not think this is serious. If the person were a physicist speculating about those analogies in the realm of waves and molecules, I would listen, not to this really. There are similar lines of argument in the anthropic principle discussions. I would count on known authorities in physics in those matters. E.g. Hoyle, Fred (1954), in Astrophysics Journal Supplement, Vol. I: "If you wanted to produce carbon and oxygen in roughly equal quantities by stellar nucleosynthesis, these are the two levels you would have to fix, and your fixing would have to be just about where these levels are actually found to be.... A commonsense interpretation of the facts suggests that a superintellect has monkeyed with physics, as well as chemistry and biology, and that there are no blind forces worth speaking about in nature." (p. 121) Nobody has observed any informational molecules to spontaneously form, even in their simplest species, and there no precursors of those molecules found in the known world. So why imagine chemical reactions becoming biological with no evidence at hand? ~D [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Philosophy, Metaphysics & the Afterlife
The Life Spectrum Hypothesis
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top