Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Time Travel Forum
Time Travel Discussion
The Many-Worlds Interpretation
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="John E. Spencer" data-source="post: 219390" data-attributes="member: 14173"><p>I see, then what would be an Interpretation best describing this nature in retrospect?</p><p>Hugh Everett III wouldn't have lived quite so near the end of his life nor would those who've contributed to the Copenhagen.</p><p>Wouldn't it imply, classically and philosophically that the observer is the only one who can witness a change in <strong>its observation?</strong></p><p><strong></strong></p><p><strong>I am quite clueless on the matter and I give my apologies in advance.</strong></p><p><strong></strong></p><p><strong></strong></p><p><strong>And another note</strong>: the Tuna Sandwich statement is subjective, as for that matter I could've easily chosen Chicken.</p><p></p><p>- Spencer</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="John E. Spencer, post: 219390, member: 14173"] I see, then what would be an Interpretation best describing this nature in retrospect? Hugh Everett III wouldn't have lived quite so near the end of his life nor would those who've contributed to the Copenhagen. Wouldn't it imply, classically and philosophically that the observer is the only one who can witness a change in [B]its observation? I am quite clueless on the matter and I give my apologies in advance. And another note[/B]: the Tuna Sandwich statement is subjective, as for that matter I could've easily chosen Chicken. - Spencer [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Time Travel Forum
Time Travel Discussion
The Many-Worlds Interpretation
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top