Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Science & Technology
The truth about evolution.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Harte" data-source="post: 152282" data-attributes="member: 443"><p>Am I? Please point out my mistake.</p><p>The paper itself states "The purpose of this report is to debunk Darwin's theory of evolution and any variant theory that relies on the natural rate of mutation to explain the origin of new genes."</p><p>My link clearly shows that evolution occurs with or without relying on the natural rate of mutation to explain the origin of new genes.</p><p>I pointed out that the natural rate of mutation is not how evolution is currently explained.</p><p>In the opening, the paper concerns itself with "junk DNA," a term from journalism - not science. Science does not consider any DNA to be "junk," and has discovered that what journalism calls "junk DNA" is actually not "junk" at all.</p><p></p><p>Therefore the paper is utterly outdated even though it was recently written (2011.)</p><p>That should tell you a few things about the author.</p><p></p><p>Harte</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Harte, post: 152282, member: 443"] Am I? Please point out my mistake. The paper itself states "The purpose of this report is to debunk Darwin's theory of evolution and any variant theory that relies on the natural rate of mutation to explain the origin of new genes." My link clearly shows that evolution occurs with or without relying on the natural rate of mutation to explain the origin of new genes. I pointed out that the natural rate of mutation is not how evolution is currently explained. In the opening, the paper concerns itself with "junk DNA," a term from journalism - not science. Science does not consider any DNA to be "junk," and has discovered that what journalism calls "junk DNA" is actually not "junk" at all. Therefore the paper is utterly outdated even though it was recently written (2011.) That should tell you a few things about the author. Harte [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Science & Technology
The truth about evolution.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top