Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Time Travel Forum
Time Machines & Experiments
Time Camera
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="MODAT7" data-source="post: 217215" data-attributes="member: 13649"><p>There are a couple of camera methods with what you're talking about.</p><p></p><p>First is just a high frame rate (slow motion if played back at normal speed). These are often used in bright light situations since the camera needs extra light for the shorter exposure time. Depending on the settings and CCD, the chip may take a shorter than needed time for the frame and sit idle for the rest of the frame time. An example would be a video recorded at 100fps, but the CCD chip is only using half of that time to record the frame, so some video information is lost. If played back in slow motion, these frames have very little motion blur in them. The other part to this is the CCD chip taking the full frame time, so for a 100fps video, the chip would really take 1/100th of a second per frame. If played back in slow motion, these will have more motion blur. Oddly the latter description looks better because the first description will look jerky when the camera is moved. If you're looking to catch a fast moving object in a bright light situation like you're mentioning, the latter description is better for not losing visual information. On the flip side, the CCD not taking the full fps rate to capture an image might mean you'd get a clearer picture of the object streaking by if the object is in frame enough... if it isn't, you'd get one of those "back half of the animal" pictures.</p><p></p><p>The second method deals with a slow frame rate in the dark similar to what I just posted from the Science Channel video. (The time stamp shows you beat me to posting by a few minutes.) If there's enough light to catch something fast moving, and the camera CCD is using the full frame rate time to capture an image, you could capture something fast, but it would be a blur. At your mentioned "faster then what our eyes can pick up" phrase, it would be a big blur in this instance, but you'd probably be able to figure out something was there if the overall image quality was good enough.</p><p></p><p>The original Star Trek series "Wink Of An Eye" episode comes to mind. While I doubt it is biologically possible to do something like in the episode, Project Phoenix is rumored to have personal cloaking devices similar to "Predator". If one of those devices also manipulated time (highly likely), there's a possibility of someone moving much faster as seen from our time reference. Depending on your view of non-corporeal beings, it is theoretically possible for one of those to be moving much faster than our time reference.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="MODAT7, post: 217215, member: 13649"] There are a couple of camera methods with what you're talking about. First is just a high frame rate (slow motion if played back at normal speed). These are often used in bright light situations since the camera needs extra light for the shorter exposure time. Depending on the settings and CCD, the chip may take a shorter than needed time for the frame and sit idle for the rest of the frame time. An example would be a video recorded at 100fps, but the CCD chip is only using half of that time to record the frame, so some video information is lost. If played back in slow motion, these frames have very little motion blur in them. The other part to this is the CCD chip taking the full frame time, so for a 100fps video, the chip would really take 1/100th of a second per frame. If played back in slow motion, these will have more motion blur. Oddly the latter description looks better because the first description will look jerky when the camera is moved. If you're looking to catch a fast moving object in a bright light situation like you're mentioning, the latter description is better for not losing visual information. On the flip side, the CCD not taking the full fps rate to capture an image might mean you'd get a clearer picture of the object streaking by if the object is in frame enough... if it isn't, you'd get one of those "back half of the animal" pictures. The second method deals with a slow frame rate in the dark similar to what I just posted from the Science Channel video. (The time stamp shows you beat me to posting by a few minutes.) If there's enough light to catch something fast moving, and the camera CCD is using the full frame rate time to capture an image, you could capture something fast, but it would be a blur. At your mentioned "faster then what our eyes can pick up" phrase, it would be a big blur in this instance, but you'd probably be able to figure out something was there if the overall image quality was good enough. The original Star Trek series "Wink Of An Eye" episode comes to mind. While I doubt it is biologically possible to do something like in the episode, Project Phoenix is rumored to have personal cloaking devices similar to "Predator". If one of those devices also manipulated time (highly likely), there's a possibility of someone moving much faster as seen from our time reference. Depending on your view of non-corporeal beings, it is theoretically possible for one of those to be moving much faster than our time reference. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Time Travel Forum
Time Machines & Experiments
Time Camera
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top