Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Time Travel Forum
Time Machines & Experiments
Time-Hacking with computers and algorithms
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Reactor1967" data-source="post: 77014" data-attributes="member: 4543"><p>The out come of my experiments have varied from time to time. I have been able to get some pretty good stuff but also at times it was a struggle to get anything at all. Practice and more practice was the key. I learned a few lessons about files and check-sums. Things that I never expected. Like finding a poor quality file and trying to find a better quality file using the same check-sum only to find out later the better quality file existed at a higher or lower check-sum.</p><p></p><p>When rolling the counter it would get close to the file but with that same check-sum would never complete the file. But, as I went to a higher and higher check-sums when the counter came around to that file pattern it it would get better.</p><p></p><p>Now, the reverse is true too. Rolling a check-sum counter as the counter rolled around to a specific file pattern for a known file the quality of that file would get poorer and poorer as counters check-sum moved away from that file.</p><p></p><p>When a counter is recreating a file I can get thousands upon thousands of the same file but each file being a little different than the last. The file itself blurs into existence then at its peak starts bluing out of existence back into complete noise.</p><p></p><p>I can go through a thousand files of the same file trying to find the best file possible where it blurred into existence then started bluing out of existence.</p><p></p><p>And just because a good time travel media file is good never accept it as real ting unill it can be proven real. Doing so can get you into trouble if your take a time travel media file as real before proving it. </p><p></p><p>These are the more interesting results of my experiments with counters.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Reactor1967, post: 77014, member: 4543"] The out come of my experiments have varied from time to time. I have been able to get some pretty good stuff but also at times it was a struggle to get anything at all. Practice and more practice was the key. I learned a few lessons about files and check-sums. Things that I never expected. Like finding a poor quality file and trying to find a better quality file using the same check-sum only to find out later the better quality file existed at a higher or lower check-sum. When rolling the counter it would get close to the file but with that same check-sum would never complete the file. But, as I went to a higher and higher check-sums when the counter came around to that file pattern it it would get better. Now, the reverse is true too. Rolling a check-sum counter as the counter rolled around to a specific file pattern for a known file the quality of that file would get poorer and poorer as counters check-sum moved away from that file. When a counter is recreating a file I can get thousands upon thousands of the same file but each file being a little different than the last. The file itself blurs into existence then at its peak starts bluing out of existence back into complete noise. I can go through a thousand files of the same file trying to find the best file possible where it blurred into existence then started bluing out of existence. And just because a good time travel media file is good never accept it as real ting unill it can be proven real. Doing so can get you into trouble if your take a time travel media file as real before proving it. These are the more interesting results of my experiments with counters. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Time Travel Forum
Time Machines & Experiments
Time-Hacking with computers and algorithms
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top