Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Time Travel Forum
Time Travel Discussion
Time Travel and Environmental Conservation
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="8thsinner" data-source="post: 257062" data-attributes="member: 15138"><p>I'm not so sure our ethics have anything to do with this idea, the scientists getting funded don't tent to have ethics, or if they do they don't get hired in the first place...Which brings me to the point that humanity isn't ready for something like that whether it's ethical or not, we aren't a unified species, in fact we're the furthest thing from it and because of this any progress made in this field would be weaponized regardless. Every digital piece of evolution is used to track us, our dna has been collected since the 60's and biology weaponized and patented against us since what late eightys, ninety's...</p><p></p><p>Bring back a sabertooth though and I doubt it would be going after humans, have you seen what most of them eat? sharks take one bite and spit out the rest...they would more likely go after deer, coyote or fox, maybe bears if there were any. </p><p></p><p>I doubt they could mutate any mammoth dna back to life, law of genesis...though in saying that if they only have 15 million in funding they might just have raised it themselves so maybe it could lead to some other revelations in how dna works. Then again, they haven't done anything positive or beneficial with gene editing yet so I would never and do not support such work. </p><p></p><p>Now, all that aside, speaking from a larger picture perspective. Would it be ethical in a civilized and mature and unified society? </p><p>I would say yes, but then I think it would also be unnecessary. Species already do drop in and out of existence, and in my opinion when they are meant to, although it's mostly only been observed with smaller life forms like plants. If there would be a good reason for something to come back then it would. </p><p></p><p>If it was possible to work around the law of genesis, which I know for a fact that it is, then it is only possible when higher souls would agree to incarnate into it. And that will never happen until we are unified in a larger way and it serves Gaia to do so.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="8thsinner, post: 257062, member: 15138"] I'm not so sure our ethics have anything to do with this idea, the scientists getting funded don't tent to have ethics, or if they do they don't get hired in the first place...Which brings me to the point that humanity isn't ready for something like that whether it's ethical or not, we aren't a unified species, in fact we're the furthest thing from it and because of this any progress made in this field would be weaponized regardless. Every digital piece of evolution is used to track us, our dna has been collected since the 60's and biology weaponized and patented against us since what late eightys, ninety's... Bring back a sabertooth though and I doubt it would be going after humans, have you seen what most of them eat? sharks take one bite and spit out the rest...they would more likely go after deer, coyote or fox, maybe bears if there were any. I doubt they could mutate any mammoth dna back to life, law of genesis...though in saying that if they only have 15 million in funding they might just have raised it themselves so maybe it could lead to some other revelations in how dna works. Then again, they haven't done anything positive or beneficial with gene editing yet so I would never and do not support such work. Now, all that aside, speaking from a larger picture perspective. Would it be ethical in a civilized and mature and unified society? I would say yes, but then I think it would also be unnecessary. Species already do drop in and out of existence, and in my opinion when they are meant to, although it's mostly only been observed with smaller life forms like plants. If there would be a good reason for something to come back then it would. If it was possible to work around the law of genesis, which I know for a fact that it is, then it is only possible when higher souls would agree to incarnate into it. And that will never happen until we are unified in a larger way and it serves Gaia to do so. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Time Travel Forum
Time Travel Discussion
Time Travel and Environmental Conservation
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top