Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Time Travel Forum
Alternate Histories & Timelines
Timelines and the AfterLife question
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="thenumbersix" data-source="post: 21699" data-attributes="member: 393"><p><strong>Re: Timelines and the AfterLife question</strong></p><p></p><p><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(\"Harte\")</div></p><p></p><p>I don't know how many you think I am suggesting but I would guess it to be quite a high number. I would think it would be a fluid process and suggest there is a 'trigger' of some sort that brings another reality into beingmaybe a critical mass. Doesn't 'collapsing the probability wave' seem suspiciously like collapsing alternate realities into the one true reality at that totally unique point in space and time ?</p><p></p><p>To cover all relevant conditions of every particle in the universe, though not dis-counted, just seems un-likely to me. Everything else naturally occuring seems to take the easiest route to fulfill its' purpose. How many particles in the universe ? We don't yet know how many 'make up' an atom. We would then need to take every possible condition of every particle and all of the combinations of each compared to the state of all of the others individually, would this figure constitute infinity (another method used to explain away the inexplicable)</p><p></p><p>Very true that a speck of dust may have a larger overall effect, as the last molecule in a tree rots away it falls down in the middle of an empty forest. It is however only that last molecules' change of state that has caused a significant change in our reality, and the atoms that make up that molecule. Chaos theory definitely works in our world but does it work in the quantum world ?</p><p></p><p>All of the previously rotting molecules of wood would have no significant effect, would nature/the universe really waste energy creating realities that serve no purpose ?</p><p></p><p>Observing the rotten tree trunk could create different realities but what would be the point of having more than necessary. I have issues with 'observations causing effects in the quantum world' mostly with how the concept is presented, but that's another story <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite39" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" /></p><p></p><p>Maybe there is more to the old saying 'Does a falling tree make a noise in the middle of a forest if nobody is there to hear it' (Has always bothered me that one)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="thenumbersix, post: 21699, member: 393"] [b]Re: Timelines and the AfterLife question[/b] <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(\"Harte\")</div> I don't know how many you think I am suggesting but I would guess it to be quite a high number. I would think it would be a fluid process and suggest there is a 'trigger' of some sort that brings another reality into beingmaybe a critical mass. Doesn't 'collapsing the probability wave' seem suspiciously like collapsing alternate realities into the one true reality at that totally unique point in space and time ? To cover all relevant conditions of every particle in the universe, though not dis-counted, just seems un-likely to me. Everything else naturally occuring seems to take the easiest route to fulfill its' purpose. How many particles in the universe ? We don't yet know how many 'make up' an atom. We would then need to take every possible condition of every particle and all of the combinations of each compared to the state of all of the others individually, would this figure constitute infinity (another method used to explain away the inexplicable) Very true that a speck of dust may have a larger overall effect, as the last molecule in a tree rots away it falls down in the middle of an empty forest. It is however only that last molecules' change of state that has caused a significant change in our reality, and the atoms that make up that molecule. Chaos theory definitely works in our world but does it work in the quantum world ? All of the previously rotting molecules of wood would have no significant effect, would nature/the universe really waste energy creating realities that serve no purpose ? Observing the rotten tree trunk could create different realities but what would be the point of having more than necessary. I have issues with 'observations causing effects in the quantum world' mostly with how the concept is presented, but that's another story ;) Maybe there is more to the old saying 'Does a falling tree make a noise in the middle of a forest if nobody is there to hear it' (Has always bothered me that one) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Time Travel Forum
Alternate Histories & Timelines
Timelines and the AfterLife question
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top