Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Time Travel Forum
John Titor's Legacy
Titor saga not over until 2015 is over
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="paradox404" data-source="post: 119133" data-attributes="member: 4523"><p>Here is one theroy I have been pondering about: </p><p></p><p>Theroy: (Titor affected our timelines relative position.)</p><p></p><p>Assuming that the time machine was recently invented, the accuracy wouldn't be particularly high, as the software would only be perhaps an early alpha quality. Assuming that, the C-204 would probably be using a worldline-relative referencing system, meaning that the machine calculates a route and then attempts to follow it back. The changes the user makes would make it difficult for the system to calculate a return trajectory and thus create errors, which in turn would probably mean the machine tries to follow the same path back. The path wouldn’t take them back however, the user would land in another worldline due to the worldline that they visited changed positions in relation to their home worldline. This would explain the necessity to nullify their effects to return home, as the temporal machine briefly appearing would create negligible effects to its relative position.</p><p></p><p>The other issue relating to relative positioning is that the universe could have completely changed but due to the relative system, the differences would be minuscule. (i.e a relative system could say only 2% divergence, but infact be 20% or more absolute divergence) In other words, the timelines COULD have been 2% different between a2001 and b2036, but the difference between a2015 and b2036 could be say 5-6% or higher. </p><p></p><p>I'm not saying he's real, but I'm not saying he's fake either. I'm simply observing at the moment.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="paradox404, post: 119133, member: 4523"] Here is one theroy I have been pondering about: Theroy: (Titor affected our timelines relative position.) Assuming that the time machine was recently invented, the accuracy wouldn't be particularly high, as the software would only be perhaps an early alpha quality. Assuming that, the C-204 would probably be using a worldline-relative referencing system, meaning that the machine calculates a route and then attempts to follow it back. The changes the user makes would make it difficult for the system to calculate a return trajectory and thus create errors, which in turn would probably mean the machine tries to follow the same path back. The path wouldn’t take them back however, the user would land in another worldline due to the worldline that they visited changed positions in relation to their home worldline. This would explain the necessity to nullify their effects to return home, as the temporal machine briefly appearing would create negligible effects to its relative position. The other issue relating to relative positioning is that the universe could have completely changed but due to the relative system, the differences would be minuscule. (i.e a relative system could say only 2% divergence, but infact be 20% or more absolute divergence) In other words, the timelines COULD have been 2% different between a2001 and b2036, but the difference between a2015 and b2036 could be say 5-6% or higher. I'm not saying he's real, but I'm not saying he's fake either. I'm simply observing at the moment. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Time Travel Forum
John Titor's Legacy
Titor saga not over until 2015 is over
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top