Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Time Travel Forum
John Titor's Legacy
Titor's 2001 Predictions Compared to 2011 Curent Time
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DarbyII" data-source="post: 48251" data-attributes="member: 145"><p>You left out ..."half of the people exposed to radiation at this level (300 rem) will die if they receive no medical attention."</p><p></p><p>And this assumes a single device, not an all-out nuclear strike against every major city of Earth. We're not debating the NRC standards. The debate concerns the scenario as posed by Titor. It's a bit disingenuous, in the above quote about a 300 rem exposure, to leave out that that specific dose is LD-50 if not treated. Who do you suppose is going to treat the victims immediately following an all-out nuclear strike? Battlefield triage, assuming any medical professionals familiar with radiation exposure treatment are out in the farmlands and are healthy enough to treat anyone, would by-pass areas exposed to 300 rem. LD-50 means "lethal does ro 50% of the population" (I believe that I said something about that in the original post). And again, it presupposes only one device.</p><p></p><p>Our boy lives 45 miles from Indianapolis, 125 miles from Cincinnati and 200 miles from both Chicago and St. Louis. There's actually 4 major cities rather than 3.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DarbyII, post: 48251, member: 145"] You left out ..."half of the people exposed to radiation at this level (300 rem) will die if they receive no medical attention." And this assumes a single device, not an all-out nuclear strike against every major city of Earth. We're not debating the NRC standards. The debate concerns the scenario as posed by Titor. It's a bit disingenuous, in the above quote about a 300 rem exposure, to leave out that that specific dose is LD-50 if not treated. Who do you suppose is going to treat the victims immediately following an all-out nuclear strike? Battlefield triage, assuming any medical professionals familiar with radiation exposure treatment are out in the farmlands and are healthy enough to treat anyone, would by-pass areas exposed to 300 rem. LD-50 means "lethal does ro 50% of the population" (I believe that I said something about that in the original post). And again, it presupposes only one device. Our boy lives 45 miles from Indianapolis, 125 miles from Cincinnati and 200 miles from both Chicago and St. Louis. There's actually 4 major cities rather than 3. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Time Travel Forum
John Titor's Legacy
Titor's 2001 Predictions Compared to 2011 Curent Time
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top