Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Spirituality & Mysticism
US schools teaching religious beliefs in science
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Unintentional" data-source="post: 14643" data-attributes="member: 22"><p><strong>US schools teaching religious beliefs in science</strong></p><p></p><p>I believe in natural selection, but natural selection is not evolution. Evolution has never been observed even with very short lived life forms and a very long study times.</p><p></p><p>Some say, oh yeah, what about bactia that becomes resistant to anti-bactia solutions? Isn't that evolution? I would say no. That is natural selection. In every case of this occuring, the bacteria always had to potential to be anti-baterial resistant, but needed a switch flipped in its DNA. This is actually evidence FOR an intelligent creator, because otherwise you have to believe the bactirea evolved with a DNA switch to be turned on to become resistant to anti-bateria solutions. Why and how could something evolve to anticipate a need that didn't exist at the time of its evolution?</p><p></p><p>Eyes are also troublesome for evolutionists. Do you recall the "tree of evolution" taught by many science classes? On one end is a single cell animal and on the other is higher life forms such as man, whales, birds, etc.. Taking aside that there is no discovered or theorized mechanism for how natural selection makes a less complicated creature into a more complicated creature..."eyes" would have to have arizen about 37 times independantly of each other. At least 37 times according to evolutionist, species split off from other species before devoloping eyes but AFTERWARDS independantly evolved binocular type vision eyes almost universally identicle to each other.</p><p></p><p>No matter what side is right, life is very improbable.</p><p></p><p><a href="http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1000728154" target="_blank">http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/ne...t_id=1000728154</a></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Unintentional, post: 14643, member: 22"] [b]US schools teaching religious beliefs in science[/b] I believe in natural selection, but natural selection is not evolution. Evolution has never been observed even with very short lived life forms and a very long study times. Some say, oh yeah, what about bactia that becomes resistant to anti-bactia solutions? Isn't that evolution? I would say no. That is natural selection. In every case of this occuring, the bacteria always had to potential to be anti-baterial resistant, but needed a switch flipped in its DNA. This is actually evidence FOR an intelligent creator, because otherwise you have to believe the bactirea evolved with a DNA switch to be turned on to become resistant to anti-bateria solutions. Why and how could something evolve to anticipate a need that didn't exist at the time of its evolution? Eyes are also troublesome for evolutionists. Do you recall the "tree of evolution" taught by many science classes? On one end is a single cell animal and on the other is higher life forms such as man, whales, birds, etc.. Taking aside that there is no discovered or theorized mechanism for how natural selection makes a less complicated creature into a more complicated creature..."eyes" would have to have arizen about 37 times independantly of each other. At least 37 times according to evolutionist, species split off from other species before devoloping eyes but AFTERWARDS independantly evolved binocular type vision eyes almost universally identicle to each other. No matter what side is right, life is very improbable. [url=http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1000728154]http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/ne...t_id=1000728154[/url] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Spirituality & Mysticism
US schools teaching religious beliefs in science
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top