Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Time Travel Forum
John Titor's Legacy
Was John Titor a Republican?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Classicalfan626" data-source="post: 137192" data-attributes="member: 6594"><p>[USER=43]@HDRKID[/USER] - That fact about JFK is probably correct. But how he describes a liberal does <em><strong>not</strong></em> describe most of <strong><em>today's</em></strong> mainstream Democrats, who are socialists and/or communists. Take Barack Obama, for instance. If you take an informed look at what he has done through his actions, it's <strong><em>impossible</em></strong> that he believes an individual liberty, freedom, capitalism, and free enterprise.</p><p></p><p>What Obama has been doing is contributing to the tearing apart the quality of society, including schools; creating government jobs and making people dependent on the government (or, buying votes), and furthermore not giving people incentives to work; and enacting and proposing legislation that put the First and Second Amendments under attack. JFK believed in safety nets for people; he did not believe in making people dependent on government entitlement programs.</p><p></p><p>Most, if not, all of these social programs are intended to buy votes for the Democratic Party and Republican establishment politicians, not to genuinely help people. Increased government involvement usually means a huge step towards socialism/communism. Most of today's mainstream Democrats, especially, believe in the concept of bringing all businesses in the power of the state before that of expanding industry. If there was minimal government involvement in our affairs, businesses and entrepreneurship would be sprouting up big time, and there would be more businesses and less of them going in debt, or bankrupt.</p><p></p><p>For all of the above reasons I've provided, Joe McCarthy was right, and it would not be tragic at all if "McCarthyism" came back. And furthermore, for those above reasons, I find your argument to be ignorant and/or ill-informed. Thus I stand by my claim that JFK was a "conservative" Democrat, and he fit the <strong><em>true</em></strong> definition of a liberal, and Obama, Hillary Clinton, Pelosi, and Reid do not!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Classicalfan626, post: 137192, member: 6594"] [USER=43]@HDRKID[/USER] - That fact about JFK is probably correct. But how he describes a liberal does [I][B]not[/B][/I] describe most of [B][I]today's[/I][/B] mainstream Democrats, who are socialists and/or communists. Take Barack Obama, for instance. If you take an informed look at what he has done through his actions, it's [B][I]impossible[/I][/B] that he believes an individual liberty, freedom, capitalism, and free enterprise. What Obama has been doing is contributing to the tearing apart the quality of society, including schools; creating government jobs and making people dependent on the government (or, buying votes), and furthermore not giving people incentives to work; and enacting and proposing legislation that put the First and Second Amendments under attack. JFK believed in safety nets for people; he did not believe in making people dependent on government entitlement programs. Most, if not, all of these social programs are intended to buy votes for the Democratic Party and Republican establishment politicians, not to genuinely help people. Increased government involvement usually means a huge step towards socialism/communism. Most of today's mainstream Democrats, especially, believe in the concept of bringing all businesses in the power of the state before that of expanding industry. If there was minimal government involvement in our affairs, businesses and entrepreneurship would be sprouting up big time, and there would be more businesses and less of them going in debt, or bankrupt. For all of the above reasons I've provided, Joe McCarthy was right, and it would not be tragic at all if "McCarthyism" came back. And furthermore, for those above reasons, I find your argument to be ignorant and/or ill-informed. Thus I stand by my claim that JFK was a "conservative" Democrat, and he fit the [B][I]true[/I][/B] definition of a liberal, and Obama, Hillary Clinton, Pelosi, and Reid do not! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Time Travel Forum
John Titor's Legacy
Was John Titor a Republican?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top