Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Time Travel Forum
John Titor's Legacy
Was there any information on the C206 machines?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="heka2015" data-source="post: 158563" data-attributes="member: 7351"><p>This information is out there and widely chewed on.</p><p>Getting people giving real thought about the "situation", is almost impossible in an open forum (don't even start in real life).</p><p>In my opinion, mostly because the tendency of just skimming information, thus not trying to understand the content, is the new cool.</p><p>Yes, I am saying that 95% never read all the post Titor made, neither trying to get the order right between questions asked and answered or doing some research of the underlying theories that he proposes are correct.</p><p></p><p>But thats a different story of information-flooding/dis-information/fake-information/buried-information.</p><p></p><p>If you pair this with the supposed debunking done already AND the missing interest of actually absorbing/reading or trying to understand the information given, you end up in the same (discussion-)corner every time you start on the Titor subject.</p><p></p><p>Theorising about future physics with observational proof missing, is a thing that cannot be done in public form, it seems.</p><p>Certain beings will always argue that your theories are not in line with the current ones they believe in.</p><p>But there is evolution in science, a lot of it, and it seems to get faster.</p><p></p><p>For example sake : darbydarbthedarbestofdarb argued since the beginning with his black holes needed too much energy and so forth.</p><p>(let alone debunking theoretical information with theoretical information is a rats tail in itself i guess)</p><p></p><p>Seems to me that real scientist give a crap about what he thinks is a done deal.</p><p>Since he argued with Titor about this, they corrected this value TWICE -> lesser energy is needed than thought.</p><p>It is still a huge amount by the way, but still, i hope i made my point.</p><p></p><p>Furthermore Micro-Singularities getting more attention and scientist start to be more open to these concepts.</p><p>Black holes in general morphed to something entirely different than thought before.</p><p>What happened there?</p><p></p><p>If one would take Titor out of the equation and just discuss the theories and the work of scientist he confirmed were/are part of it,</p><p>you will end up with a couple of very valid discussions.</p><p>The problem of all this is, if you take Titor out, you probably need at least one PhD in Theoretical Physics and a lot of balls to be in the club to seriously discuss all this, sitting at a table with Susskind, Hawking, Verlinde and the like.</p><p></p><p>[USER=6456]@TimeFlipper[/USER]</p><p>Wasn't expecting questions x_X </p><p>Answer already there!</p><p>Read Nr. 3 or Nr. 8</p><p>Whatever rocks your boat, i guess.</p><p>[ATTACH=full]6488[/ATTACH]</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="heka2015, post: 158563, member: 7351"] This information is out there and widely chewed on. Getting people giving real thought about the "situation", is almost impossible in an open forum (don't even start in real life). In my opinion, mostly because the tendency of just skimming information, thus not trying to understand the content, is the new cool. Yes, I am saying that 95% never read all the post Titor made, neither trying to get the order right between questions asked and answered or doing some research of the underlying theories that he proposes are correct. But thats a different story of information-flooding/dis-information/fake-information/buried-information. If you pair this with the supposed debunking done already AND the missing interest of actually absorbing/reading or trying to understand the information given, you end up in the same (discussion-)corner every time you start on the Titor subject. Theorising about future physics with observational proof missing, is a thing that cannot be done in public form, it seems. Certain beings will always argue that your theories are not in line with the current ones they believe in. But there is evolution in science, a lot of it, and it seems to get faster. For example sake : darbydarbthedarbestofdarb argued since the beginning with his black holes needed too much energy and so forth. (let alone debunking theoretical information with theoretical information is a rats tail in itself i guess) Seems to me that real scientist give a crap about what he thinks is a done deal. Since he argued with Titor about this, they corrected this value TWICE -> lesser energy is needed than thought. It is still a huge amount by the way, but still, i hope i made my point. Furthermore Micro-Singularities getting more attention and scientist start to be more open to these concepts. Black holes in general morphed to something entirely different than thought before. What happened there? If one would take Titor out of the equation and just discuss the theories and the work of scientist he confirmed were/are part of it, you will end up with a couple of very valid discussions. The problem of all this is, if you take Titor out, you probably need at least one PhD in Theoretical Physics and a lot of balls to be in the club to seriously discuss all this, sitting at a table with Susskind, Hawking, Verlinde and the like. [USER=6456]@TimeFlipper[/USER] Wasn't expecting questions x_X Answer already there! Read Nr. 3 or Nr. 8 Whatever rocks your boat, i guess. [ATTACH=full]6488[/ATTACH] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Time Travel Forum
John Titor's Legacy
Was there any information on the C206 machines?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top