Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Time Travel Forum
Time Travelers
What Evidence Do You Need?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="AAA" data-source="post: 119175" data-attributes="member: 5790"><p>I am unfamiliar with the 3 newspaper headlines example.</p><p></p><p>Aside from an actual demonstration, everything else is ultimately a form of information traveling through time. The medium of conveyance can be almost anything under varying circumstances. The reason I say photographic evidence is unreliable is that it can be manipulated.</p><p></p><p>You would have to make sure to authenticate the integrity of the photograph along with whatever information was on said photograph. You can't base your authentication on assuming it is authentic because it is a captured image or recording, etc.</p><p></p><p>Ultimately, it is still about the information contained in the photograph relative to the time line. The photograph is simply a medium of conveyance. ...one that would need authentication. In order to prove it, you have to essentially authenticate all the relevant events and circumstances.</p><p></p><p>And then you have to consider that definitively proving anything is relative to the witnesses/participants. That is to say that unless they are witness to all events and circumstances, all necessary qualifiers of authenticating the proofs, there is always a question of authenticity. In other words, it only counts to those involved to watch it all.</p><p></p><p>It gets complicated.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="AAA, post: 119175, member: 5790"] I am unfamiliar with the 3 newspaper headlines example. Aside from an actual demonstration, everything else is ultimately a form of information traveling through time. The medium of conveyance can be almost anything under varying circumstances. The reason I say photographic evidence is unreliable is that it can be manipulated. You would have to make sure to authenticate the integrity of the photograph along with whatever information was on said photograph. You can't base your authentication on assuming it is authentic because it is a captured image or recording, etc. Ultimately, it is still about the information contained in the photograph relative to the time line. The photograph is simply a medium of conveyance. ...one that would need authentication. In order to prove it, you have to essentially authenticate all the relevant events and circumstances. And then you have to consider that definitively proving anything is relative to the witnesses/participants. That is to say that unless they are witness to all events and circumstances, all necessary qualifiers of authenticating the proofs, there is always a question of authenticity. In other words, it only counts to those involved to watch it all. It gets complicated. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Time Travel Forum
Time Travelers
What Evidence Do You Need?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top