Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Time Travel Forum
Time Travel Discussion
What Evidence Would You Need for a Time Travel Claim?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="PerfectlyStrange" data-source="post: 54207" data-attributes="member: 3164"><p><span style="font-size: 18px"><span style="font-family: 'times new roman'">This is not part of the machine. It is not a part of the schematics, or any of the other pictures. It was simply sitting on top of the machine. I will say, however, that it does seem curious that it's sitting on top of the machine. I agree that it is not a part of any time machine. Ok, your claim is interesting, but it does not disprove John Titor's claims any more than my ideas verify them. I, instead offer a counter to your argument. Let's for a second assume that John Titor is in fact a time traveler, no doubt. Ok, He was in the '70s to get the IBM unit. In this time, remember, it's still the cold war. People have use for things like geiger counters, and other radiation detection equipment. Ok, put yourself in the time traveler's shoes at this point. You are in a post-apocalyptic radioactive society that has been rebuilt less than 25 years ago. You are also in the military. You also have a strong background in science. You time travel to the 1970s. You're here for your IBM unit, but it will be some time before you can go back into the future. Why not look around for some interesting memorabilia? You find a primitive radiation detection system. Not only do you find the machine interesting, but hell, it's useful in your time, too! </span></span></p><p> </p><p><span style="font-size: 18px"><span style="font-family: 'times new roman'">I'm not saying you're wrong about anything, because I don't know. I just believe that it doesn't immediately discredit the</span> claims, in any means. </span></p><p> </p><p><span style="font-size: 18px">Sorry if the font looks strange in this message, it's been acting funny for me with my computer's spellcheck. </span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="PerfectlyStrange, post: 54207, member: 3164"] [SIZE=5][FONT=times new roman]This is not part of the machine. It is not a part of the schematics, or any of the other pictures. It was simply sitting on top of the machine. I will say, however, that it does seem curious that it's sitting on top of the machine. I agree that it is not a part of any time machine. Ok, your claim is interesting, but it does not disprove John Titor's claims any more than my ideas verify them. I, instead offer a counter to your argument. Let's for a second assume that John Titor is in fact a time traveler, no doubt. Ok, He was in the '70s to get the IBM unit. In this time, remember, it's still the cold war. People have use for things like geiger counters, and other radiation detection equipment. Ok, put yourself in the time traveler's shoes at this point. You are in a post-apocalyptic radioactive society that has been rebuilt less than 25 years ago. You are also in the military. You also have a strong background in science. You time travel to the 1970s. You're here for your IBM unit, but it will be some time before you can go back into the future. Why not look around for some interesting memorabilia? You find a primitive radiation detection system. Not only do you find the machine interesting, but hell, it's useful in your time, too! [/FONT][/SIZE] [SIZE=5][FONT=times new roman]I'm not saying you're wrong about anything, because I don't know. I just believe that it doesn't immediately discredit the[/FONT] claims, in any means. [/SIZE] [SIZE=5]Sorry if the font looks strange in this message, it's been acting funny for me with my computer's spellcheck. [/SIZE] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Time Travel Forum
Time Travel Discussion
What Evidence Would You Need for a Time Travel Claim?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top