Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Time Travel Forum
Alternate Histories & Timelines
What Obligation Does a Person Have to Parallel World Lines?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="temporal recon" data-source="post: 55238" data-attributes="member: 2826"><p>Einstein,</p><p> </p><p> I believe you may have missed the point of my question regarding how to determine if an 'accidental' death was in fact accidental. </p><p> </p><p>You infer that a death could be accidental if it were unanticipated (i.e. not happening on a closely div'd WL). </p><p> </p><p>My point in my question above was that all actions and events <u>must be </u>mirrored between the respective world lines. What this means is that any death on a given worldline is exactly mirrored on any closely div'd WL "next" to it. So, then, how can anyone define accidental as unanticipated?</p><p> </p><p>But I think we are going off on a tangent here.</p><p> </p><p>Turning back to my original question, do we have any obligation to "allow" history to unfold as we "know it" to have unfolded on our original (home) worldline? If we knew a terrorist attack was going to happen, does the time traveler have any obligation to warn the attack's victims?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="temporal recon, post: 55238, member: 2826"] Einstein, I believe you may have missed the point of my question regarding how to determine if an 'accidental' death was in fact accidental. You infer that a death could be accidental if it were unanticipated (i.e. not happening on a closely div'd WL). My point in my question above was that all actions and events [U]must be [/U]mirrored between the respective world lines. What this means is that any death on a given worldline is exactly mirrored on any closely div'd WL "next" to it. So, then, how can anyone define accidental as unanticipated? But I think we are going off on a tangent here. Turning back to my original question, do we have any obligation to "allow" history to unfold as we "know it" to have unfolded on our original (home) worldline? If we knew a terrorist attack was going to happen, does the time traveler have any obligation to warn the attack's victims? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Time Travel Forum
Alternate Histories & Timelines
What Obligation Does a Person Have to Parallel World Lines?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top