Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Conspiracies & Cover-ups
White Paper on Revolutionary Technology - X-FORCE
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Heinrich Hundekok" data-source="post: 19597" data-attributes="member: 354"><p><strong>Re: White Paper on Revolutionary Technology - X-FORCE</strong></p><p></p><p>Realtimeguy,</p><p> </p><p>I hope you realise that this sounds pretty far-fetched, especially to people who know their physics. Some people in this forum will easily be made willing to believe this theory of yours, but others wont. I'm one of those others.</p><p> </p><p>Now, please... don't mistake my attitude as hostility. I just want things to be right - there are youngsters in here that may mistake your theories as officially accepted science because it looks just like stuff you can look up in a real science book. Let's have a look at that theory:</p><p> </p><p><strong> </strong></p><p><strong></strong></p><p>Now, can you give us as much as <em><strong>one single</strong></em> link to a trusted physics- or science-site (such as <a href="http://www.howstuffworks.com/" target="_blank">www.howstuffworks.com</a>) that will confirm <em><strong>any</strong></em> of the above statements in your theory?</p><p> </p><p>How would these created neutrinos be able to move <em><strong>faster</strong></em> than light? Why aren't they just regular neutrinos, like the ones the sun and other stars produce in huge numbers every second?</p><p> </p><p>Please remember that relativistic (near-light) speed does not in itself cause distortion of time/space - or time travel if you like. This would only happen if the body in motion has an <em>invariant mass</em> ie. the body has weight not only when it moves, but also when it stands still. Examples of particles that have NO invariant mass are photons and neutrinos.</p><p> </p><p>Space/time distortion is caused by <em>mass</em>. This mass can either exist as "regular" material or as an object that already has invariant mass moving at very high speeds (Really it is particles with "high energies" - the term is applied to f.inst. very hot particles in stars or particles accellerated using a machine). Any sort of energy-beam or mass-less particle will NOT cause space/time distortion no matter its speed.</p><p> </p><p><a href="http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/SR/light_mass.html" target="_blank">http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Rela...light_mass.html</a></p><p> </p><p>Another thing. Look at this:</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>Look at the two underlined statements. Don't you find this just a little contradictory? </p><p> </p><p>Happy thinking</p><p> </p><p>H.H.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Heinrich Hundekok, post: 19597, member: 354"] [b]Re: White Paper on Revolutionary Technology - X-FORCE[/b] Realtimeguy, I hope you realise that this sounds pretty far-fetched, especially to people who know their physics. Some people in this forum will easily be made willing to believe this theory of yours, but others wont. I'm one of those others. Now, please... don't mistake my attitude as hostility. I just want things to be right - there are youngsters in here that may mistake your theories as officially accepted science because it looks just like stuff you can look up in a real science book. Let's have a look at that theory: [b] [/b] Now, can you give us as much as [i][b]one single[/b][/i] link to a trusted physics- or science-site (such as [url=http://www.howstuffworks.com/]www.howstuffworks.com[/url]) that will confirm [i][b]any[/b][/i] of the above statements in your theory? How would these created neutrinos be able to move [i][b]faster[/b][/i] than light? Why aren't they just regular neutrinos, like the ones the sun and other stars produce in huge numbers every second? Please remember that relativistic (near-light) speed does not in itself cause distortion of time/space - or time travel if you like. This would only happen if the body in motion has an [i]invariant mass[/i] ie. the body has weight not only when it moves, but also when it stands still. Examples of particles that have NO invariant mass are photons and neutrinos. Space/time distortion is caused by [i]mass[/i]. This mass can either exist as "regular" material or as an object that already has invariant mass moving at very high speeds (Really it is particles with "high energies" - the term is applied to f.inst. very hot particles in stars or particles accellerated using a machine). Any sort of energy-beam or mass-less particle will NOT cause space/time distortion no matter its speed. [url=http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/SR/light_mass.html]http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Rela...light_mass.html[/url] Another thing. Look at this: [b] [/b] Look at the two underlined statements. Don't you find this just a little contradictory? Happy thinking H.H. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Conspiracies & Cover-ups
White Paper on Revolutionary Technology - X-FORCE
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top