Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Conspiracies & Cover-ups
White Paper on Revolutionary Technology - X-FORCE
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Heinrich Hundekok" data-source="post: 19599" data-attributes="member: 354"><p><strong>Re: White Paper on Revolutionary Technology - X-FORCE</strong></p><p></p><p>Realtimeguy,</p><p></p><p>I'm a bit confused...</p><p>Your theory is quite a mouthfull, so I'll just stick to commenting the neutrino part.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>I suppose you do realise that it takes quite a high amount of energy to start a neutrino-producing reaction. The two most common sources is from the suns centre and from nuclear reactions in the upper atmosphere triggered by "hard" fast particle radiation. How can it be possible to copy these high-energy processes with nothing but a common electromagnet? By the way, which type of neutrino is the product of the x-force? Electron, muon or tau?</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>How about good old friction? Would'nt this account for the energy loss? </p><p> </p><p>Or turned the other way around:</p><p> </p><p>How about electromagnets made of a super conducting material? Why hasn't this loss of energy due to the generation of x-force ever been observed here? </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>Now, this one's pretty hard for me to swallow! I do not deny the existence of "particles" beeing able to travel FTL - the theorized-about so called <em>tachyons</em> - but, Realtimeguy, neutrinos are way out of that class. They're still not fully understood, fair enough! There's a wider window o' possibillity here, but...</p><p>This is still too far out. And what about the "faster than light = future time span" idea? </p><p>It is commonly accepted that the faster you go, the heavier you (and your ship) gets. As a result of this gain in <em>relativistic</em> mass, time is slowed down compared to the "neutral" surrounding space - or you could say that the ship travels into the future. The closer to C you get, the faster you travel into the future. The speed C = infinite mass (which is impossible) = infinite TT-speed.</p><p> </p><p>But.... <em>Faster</em> than light speeds... if possible <em>at all</em>, how would they apply to this widely accepted and experimentally verified theory?</p><p> </p><p>I'm just asking.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p>Happy thinking! <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite38" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /> </p><p> </p><p>H.H.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Heinrich Hundekok, post: 19599, member: 354"] [b]Re: White Paper on Revolutionary Technology - X-FORCE[/b] Realtimeguy, I'm a bit confused... Your theory is quite a mouthfull, so I'll just stick to commenting the neutrino part. I suppose you do realise that it takes quite a high amount of energy to start a neutrino-producing reaction. The two most common sources is from the suns centre and from nuclear reactions in the upper atmosphere triggered by "hard" fast particle radiation. How can it be possible to copy these high-energy processes with nothing but a common electromagnet? By the way, which type of neutrino is the product of the x-force? Electron, muon or tau? [b][/b] How about good old friction? Would'nt this account for the energy loss? Or turned the other way around: How about electromagnets made of a super conducting material? Why hasn't this loss of energy due to the generation of x-force ever been observed here? Now, this one's pretty hard for me to swallow! I do not deny the existence of "particles" beeing able to travel FTL - the theorized-about so called [i]tachyons[/i] - but, Realtimeguy, neutrinos are way out of that class. They're still not fully understood, fair enough! There's a wider window o' possibillity here, but... This is still too far out. And what about the "faster than light = future time span" idea? It is commonly accepted that the faster you go, the heavier you (and your ship) gets. As a result of this gain in [i]relativistic[/i] mass, time is slowed down compared to the "neutral" surrounding space - or you could say that the ship travels into the future. The closer to C you get, the faster you travel into the future. The speed C = infinite mass (which is impossible) = infinite TT-speed. But.... [i]Faster[/i] than light speeds... if possible [i]at all[/i], how would they apply to this widely accepted and experimentally verified theory? I'm just asking. Happy thinking! :) H.H. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Conspiracies & Cover-ups
White Paper on Revolutionary Technology - X-FORCE
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top