Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Time Travel Forum
Time Travel Discussion
Why I dont believe in HDRs
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Harte" data-source="post: 13109" data-attributes="member: 443"><p><strong>Re: Why I dont believe in HDRs</strong></p><p></p><p><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(\"J-Truthseeker\")</div></p><p> </p><p>This is blatantly false and any first year chemistry or physics student knows it. Newtonian rectilinear motion, for a trivial example, can be and is regularly measured in physics labs at high schools and colleges all over the world on a daily basis. The results of these measurements must be precise or their grades suffer. An "A" student doing a spring experiment in China will find that F=mK as well as an "A" student in New Jersey.</p><p> </p><p>General relativity is tested every time there is a total solar eclipse. No variation from prediction has ever been found since the first time it was tested.</p><p> </p><p>And there is an "exact" unit of measurement for every physical measurement that exists. As an example, a meter is defined in wavelengths of a particular type of light emission. Do you imply that the wavelengths of various "colors" are not constant?</p><p> </p><p> </p><p><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(\"J-Truthseeker\")</div></p><p> </p><p>The machine you are typing your post on you owe to this "chase" you denigrate. Were it not for Quantum Mechanics, you would still be using vacuum tubes.</p><p> </p><p><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(\"J-Truthseeker\")</div></p><p> </p><p>Hmm. "I know all this to be true but I'm to busy to try to convice you, find it out for yoursef." You sound like the skeptics you invented and shot down in your previous post. This is about what I expected. Unnamed volumes of books, a lifetime of study leads you into some <em>belief</em> system. Well, not me. </p><p> </p><p>The four theoretical statements you made all use statistics and trend analysis. I ask you again, where can I find this information?</p><p> </p><p>You would invoke psychology to explain "zero point fields," "radionics," "natural grid points," "psychic force energy" and "orgone"? Please, enlighten me.</p><p> </p><p>I seem to remember back in the sixties there was a buzz at Duke about some statistical evidence for the existence of ESP. If you look at the test results, there was a slightly higher than random score of some of the test subjects. But the results could never be repeated, by the original theorist or any others around the world, whether or not the same test subjects (people) were used. As far as actual evidence for the existence of psychic abilities, that's about it.</p><p> </p><p>I am aware that the defense dept. has attempted to use so-called "psychics" for remote viewing of the enemy (Russia). I will agree that it's possible that they had enough success to clamp a lid on serious study of the phenomenon for security's sake. But if you think about it, all the "enemy" would have to do is get one skeptical "mole" into the area of the remote viewer and he/she would be completely and utterly unable to perform due to the proximity of the non-believer.</p><p> </p><p>There has never, ever been any objective evidence presented for the existence of UFO's or extraterrestrials on Earth. There do exist some unexplained photos and film/videotape however.</p><p> </p><p><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(\"J-Truthseeker\")</div></p><p> </p><p>Why do you assume I have not? It seems a closed-minded, subjective way of looking at me in my opinion.</p><p> </p><p>I have looked and am continuing to look. Why else would I have asked you for evidence? Post a url, at least. I know of at least 20 sites that talk about these things you are claiming. None offer any evidence. I have looked, I am looking, I am finding nothing.</p><p> </p><p>For your information, I am willing to postulate that there are strange unexplained things in the world. I must stress, however, that these things are unexplained by anyone, that means doctors of any variety, be they PhD or witchdoctor.</p><p> </p><p><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(\"J-Truthseeker\")</div></p><p> </p><p>I have not read the above work. But I would ask you to consider the difference between ALS and dislexia. Also, will you not admit the possibility that it is the genius mind or the "fringe" thinking that causes the problem, and not vice-versa? Can it not be that a great thinker like Newton perhaps thinks too much? A "nervous breakdown" can mean many things, and let's face it, the retarded are rarely depressed.</p><p> </p><p>Harte</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Harte, post: 13109, member: 443"] [b]Re: Why I dont believe in HDRs[/b] <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(\"J-Truthseeker\")</div> This is blatantly false and any first year chemistry or physics student knows it. Newtonian rectilinear motion, for a trivial example, can be and is regularly measured in physics labs at high schools and colleges all over the world on a daily basis. The results of these measurements must be precise or their grades suffer. An "A" student doing a spring experiment in China will find that F=mK as well as an "A" student in New Jersey. General relativity is tested every time there is a total solar eclipse. No variation from prediction has ever been found since the first time it was tested. And there is an "exact" unit of measurement for every physical measurement that exists. As an example, a meter is defined in wavelengths of a particular type of light emission. Do you imply that the wavelengths of various "colors" are not constant? <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(\"J-Truthseeker\")</div> The machine you are typing your post on you owe to this "chase" you denigrate. Were it not for Quantum Mechanics, you would still be using vacuum tubes. <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(\"J-Truthseeker\")</div> Hmm. "I know all this to be true but I'm to busy to try to convice you, find it out for yoursef." You sound like the skeptics you invented and shot down in your previous post. This is about what I expected. Unnamed volumes of books, a lifetime of study leads you into some [i]belief[/i] system. Well, not me. The four theoretical statements you made all use statistics and trend analysis. I ask you again, where can I find this information? You would invoke psychology to explain "zero point fields," "radionics," "natural grid points," "psychic force energy" and "orgone"? Please, enlighten me. I seem to remember back in the sixties there was a buzz at Duke about some statistical evidence for the existence of ESP. If you look at the test results, there was a slightly higher than random score of some of the test subjects. But the results could never be repeated, by the original theorist or any others around the world, whether or not the same test subjects (people) were used. As far as actual evidence for the existence of psychic abilities, that's about it. I am aware that the defense dept. has attempted to use so-called "psychics" for remote viewing of the enemy (Russia). I will agree that it's possible that they had enough success to clamp a lid on serious study of the phenomenon for security's sake. But if you think about it, all the "enemy" would have to do is get one skeptical "mole" into the area of the remote viewer and he/she would be completely and utterly unable to perform due to the proximity of the non-believer. There has never, ever been any objective evidence presented for the existence of UFO's or extraterrestrials on Earth. There do exist some unexplained photos and film/videotape however. <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(\"J-Truthseeker\")</div> Why do you assume I have not? It seems a closed-minded, subjective way of looking at me in my opinion. I have looked and am continuing to look. Why else would I have asked you for evidence? Post a url, at least. I know of at least 20 sites that talk about these things you are claiming. None offer any evidence. I have looked, I am looking, I am finding nothing. For your information, I am willing to postulate that there are strange unexplained things in the world. I must stress, however, that these things are unexplained by anyone, that means doctors of any variety, be they PhD or witchdoctor. <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(\"J-Truthseeker\")</div> I have not read the above work. But I would ask you to consider the difference between ALS and dislexia. Also, will you not admit the possibility that it is the genius mind or the "fringe" thinking that causes the problem, and not vice-versa? Can it not be that a great thinker like Newton perhaps thinks too much? A "nervous breakdown" can mean many things, and let's face it, the retarded are rarely depressed. Harte [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Time Travel Forum
Time Travel Discussion
Why I dont believe in HDRs
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top