Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Science & Technology
Why microsingularaties haven't been discovered yet
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="paradox404" data-source="post: 215802" data-attributes="member: 4523"><p>I've been making a number of strides in my research lately and want to share an observation I've made in relation to the lifespan of micro-black holes. Technically the following knowledge is already available to anyone that can fathom the math, though I'd share it anyway.</p><p></p><p>Any black holes created, will evaporate before they can be discovered according to the hawking radiation theory. [ATTACH=full]11896[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p>As can be seen from the math, a singularity weighing 1200 Kg only lasts for about 4 and a half seconds. A 24T singularly lasts for about 10hrs, yet a 200Kg singularly lasts a fraction of a second.</p><p></p><p>I imagine this is the exact reason CERN hasn't observed them yet, though I think it's possible that the subparticles they keep finding are the remnants of decayed black holes.</p><p></p><p>Realistically to observe a black hole, you'd need to have a matter injector shoving tens to hundreds of kilos into the singularity every second, at least until it reaches 12 tons.</p><p></p><p>On that note, I have doubts that John Titors TDU would be liftable by a human unless it had a way of manipulating the decay time of it's singularity. </p><p></p><p>Might post more of this later on if people are interested.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="paradox404, post: 215802, member: 4523"] I've been making a number of strides in my research lately and want to share an observation I've made in relation to the lifespan of micro-black holes. Technically the following knowledge is already available to anyone that can fathom the math, though I'd share it anyway. Any black holes created, will evaporate before they can be discovered according to the hawking radiation theory. [ATTACH type="full"]11896[/ATTACH] As can be seen from the math, a singularity weighing 1200 Kg only lasts for about 4 and a half seconds. A 24T singularly lasts for about 10hrs, yet a 200Kg singularly lasts a fraction of a second. I imagine this is the exact reason CERN hasn't observed them yet, though I think it's possible that the subparticles they keep finding are the remnants of decayed black holes. Realistically to observe a black hole, you'd need to have a matter injector shoving tens to hundreds of kilos into the singularity every second, at least until it reaches 12 tons. On that note, I have doubts that John Titors TDU would be liftable by a human unless it had a way of manipulating the decay time of it's singularity. Might post more of this later on if people are interested. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Science & Technology
Why microsingularaties haven't been discovered yet
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top