Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Science & Technology
Why microsingularaties haven't been discovered yet
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="paradox404" data-source="post: 215819" data-attributes="member: 4523"><p>The intended use case I'm working on is for faster than light travel, not necessarily time travel. This specific formula is for the drive spindown duration, a modification of the original equation.</p><p></p><p>The spindown to base mass modification is represented as the 1-(m2/m1). This isn't exactly accurate though, it does give a good rough estimate though. </p><p></p><p>Writing this gave me an idea on how to solve the issue. Precalcuate the base mass decay and remove the base decay from the spooled decay.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>On the topic of John's air bubble, I have doubts that the bubble can maintain an atmosphere. It could be possible, though it'd need to be tested first.</p><p></p><p>Using the machine for time travel is tricky as you'd be effectively blind or chasing a moving object, which makes the concept more of a data issue.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="paradox404, post: 215819, member: 4523"] The intended use case I'm working on is for faster than light travel, not necessarily time travel. This specific formula is for the drive spindown duration, a modification of the original equation. The spindown to base mass modification is represented as the 1-(m2/m1). This isn't exactly accurate though, it does give a good rough estimate though. Writing this gave me an idea on how to solve the issue. Precalcuate the base mass decay and remove the base decay from the spooled decay. On the topic of John's air bubble, I have doubts that the bubble can maintain an atmosphere. It could be possible, though it'd need to be tested first. Using the machine for time travel is tricky as you'd be effectively blind or chasing a moving object, which makes the concept more of a data issue. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Science & Technology
Why microsingularaties haven't been discovered yet
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top